CVE-2020-8757
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds read in subsystem for Intel(R) AMT versions before 11.8.80, 11.12.80, 11.22.80, 12.0.70 and 14.0.45 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) subsystem. A privileged local user could exploit this to read sensitive memory contents beyond allocated buffers, potentially leading to privilege escalation. The vulnerability affects multiple AMT version branches prior to the specified patched releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.8.80>= 11.12.0, < 11.12.80>= 11.22.0, < 11.22.80>= 12.0, < 12.0.70>= 14.0, < 14.0.45all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Intel AMT is present and enabledCheck system BIOS/UEFI settings or use system information utilities to determine if Intel Active Management Technology is enabled on the device. On Windows, you can also check the Intel Management Engine Interface (MEI) driver status in Device Manager.Affected if Intel AMT is enabled on the system - the vulnerability only affects systems where AMT is active
-
Determine Intel AMT firmware versionUse Intel management tools (such as Intel AMT SDK utilities, OEM firmware update tools, or system management interfaces) to query the currently installed AMT firmware version. The version is typically displayed in the AMT firmware information or BIOS management screens.Affected if The installed AMT firmware version falls within any of these vulnerable ranges: < 11.8.80, >= 11.12.0 and < 11.12.80, >= 11.22.0 and < 11.22.80, >= 12.0 and < 12.0.70, or >= 14.0 and < 14.0.45
-
Check for NetApp Cloud Backup installationInspect installed software inventory or application list on the system to determine if NetApp Cloud Backup is present.Affected if NetApp Cloud Backup is installed - all versions of this product are affected according to the CVE details
The system is affected by CVE-2020-8757 if Intel AMT is enabled and the firmware version is within any of the vulnerable ranges listed, or if NetApp Cloud Backup is installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data11.8.8011.12.8011.22.80
Update Intel AMT firmware to version 11.8.80, 11.12.80, 11.22.80, 12.0.70, 14.0.45 or later. This typically requires BIOS/firmware update deployment through vendor management tools or OEM update mechanisms.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-8757 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-8757 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data