CVE-2020-8768
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on Phoenix Contact Emalytics Controller ILC 2050 BI before 1.2.3 and BI-L before 1.2.3 devices. There is an insecure mechanism for read and write access to the configuration of the device. The mechanism can be discovered by examining a link on the website of the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Phoenix Contact Emalytics Controller ILC 2050 BI and BI-L devices before version 1.2.3 contain an insecure mechanism allowing unauthorized read and write access to device configuration. This access mechanism can be discovered by examining a link on the device's web interface, exposing sensitive configuration data and allowing modification of device settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.3< 1.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the device firmware versionAccess the device's web interface or administrative console and navigate to the system information or firmware version settings page. This is typically found in the device's 'System', 'About', or 'Status' section.Affected if The displayed firmware version is earlier than 1.2.3 (e.g., 1.2.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.0, or any version number less than 1.2.3)
-
Verify the web interface is accessibleConfirm you can reach the device's web interface by entering the device's IP address in a web browser. The device should present a login page or status page.Affected if The web interface is accessible over the network (this is a prerequisite for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Check for the exposed configuration linkAfter logging into the web interface, examine the page source or navigate through the menus to look for any links or endpoints that provide direct access to device configuration settings without additional authentication. Look for URLs or links that may expose configuration parameters directly.Affected if A direct link or endpoint exists that allows unauthorized access to read or modify device configuration settings without proper authentication
-
Identify if configuration can be modified without authorizationAttempt to access the configuration area through the exposed link mechanism. Determine if sensitive settings such as network configuration, device parameters, or system settings can be viewed or altered without requiring elevated privileges beyond the standard web login.Affected if Configuration data can be read or written through an undocumented or insecure mechanism that bypasses normal authentication controls
The device is affected if it runs firmware version earlier than 1.2.3 and exposes an unauthenticated configuration access mechanism through its web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.3
Upgrade Phoenix Contact Emalytics Controller ILC 2050 BI and BI-L devices to firmware version 1.2.3 or later to address the insecure configuration access mechanism.
Firmware version 1.2.3
- Obtain firmware version 1.2.3 or later from the official Phoenix Contact support website or trusted distribution channel
- Review the official Phoenix Contact firmware upgrade documentation for the ILC 2050 BI and BI-L devices
- Create a backup of the current device configuration before performing the upgrade
- Follow the vendor's recommended firmware upgrade procedure, typically involving uploading the firmware file through the device's web interface or management tool
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the firmware version in the device management interface
- Confirm the insecure configuration access mechanism is no longer accessible
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-8768 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-8768 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data