Foxit Studio PhotoApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2020-8878

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-03-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.6.6.918 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Studio Photo 3.6.6.916. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of PSD files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9625.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Foxit Studio Photo 3.6.6.916 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in its PSD file parser. The application fails to properly validate user-supplied data when parsing PSD files, allowing a write past the end of an allocated structure. Exploitation requires a user to open a malicious PSD file, enabling arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.

MitigationUsers should avoid opening untrusted PSD files and should update to the latest patched version of Foxit Studio Photo when available. Organizations may consider deploying additional file-scanning controls at email/gateway perimeters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Foxit Studio PhotoApplication
Affected:<= 3.6.6.918

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Foxit Studio Photo is installed
    Open Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion' in PowerShell to list installed software and version
    Affected if Foxit Studio Photo appears in the installed programs list
  2. Verify the installed version number
    Locate the main executable (typically Foxit Studio Photo.exe) in the installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\Foxit Software\Foxit Studio Photo\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Foxit Software\Foxit Studio Photo\), right-click the .exe, select Properties, and check the File Version on the Details tab
    Affected if The displayed version is 3.6.6.918 or any lower version (e.g., 3.6.6.916, 3.6.5.x, etc.)
  3. Determine if PSD file processing is used
    Check if the application has been used to open, edit, or convert PSD (Photoshop Document) files. Review recent file history, logs, or user workflow documentation for PSD file operations
    Affected if Users have opened or processed PSD files with Foxit Studio Photo, as this is the specific feature that triggers the vulnerable code path

The environment is affected only if Foxit Studio Photo version 3.6.6.918 or lower is installed AND users process PSD files with the application.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.6.6.918
Interim mitigation

Users should avoid opening untrusted PSD files and should update to the latest patched version of Foxit Studio Photo when available. Organizations may consider deploying additional file-scanning controls at email/gateway perimeters.

Fix this in Foxit Studio Photo Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-8878 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-8878 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data