CVE-2020-9200
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere has a CSV injection vulnerability in iManager NetEco 6000 versions V600R021C00. An attacker with common privilege may exploit this vulnerability through some operations to inject the CSV files. Due to insufficient input validation of some parameters, the attacker can exploit this vulnerability to inject CSV files to the target device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCSV injection vulnerability in iManager NetEco 6000 V600R021C00 allows attackers with common privileges to inject malicious formulas into CSV export files through insufficient input validation of certain parameters. When users open these crafted CSV files in spreadsheet applications, embedded formula characters (=, +, -, @) can trigger code execution or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v600r021c00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetEco 6000 versionCheck the installed iManager NetEco 6000 version through the system information panel, about page, or version check utility. The version is typically visible in the UI footer or system management section.Affected if Version is V600R021C00 exactly
-
Confirm CSV export feature accessLocate CSV export functionality in the NetEco interface, typically found in reports, data export, or monitoring sections where users can export data to CSV format.Affected if CSV export feature is present and accessible to users with common privileges
-
Inspect exported CSV files for injection markersReview any CSV files exported from the system. Open files in a text editor (not Excel) and inspect for formula-initiating characters (=, +, -, @) appearing at the start of data fields where they would not normally appear.Affected if CSV files contain formula characters (=, +, -, @) embedded in data fields
Environment is affected if running iManager NetEco 6000 version V600R021C00 and the CSV export feature is available to users with common privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all parameters that populate CSV exports, escaping or stripping formula-initiating characters (=, +, -, @, tab, CR) before写入 CSV files. Apply context-aware output encoding based on the export function.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9200 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9200 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data