CVE-2020-9235
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHuawei smartphones HONOR 20 PRO Versions earlier than 10.1.0.230(C432E9R5P1),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.231(C10E3R3P2),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.231(C185E3R5P1),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.231(C636E3R3P1);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.212(C432E10R3P4),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.213(C636E3R4P3),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.214(C10E5R4P3),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.214(C185E3R3P3);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.212(C00E210R5P1);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C01E160R2P11);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R8P12);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.230(C432E9R5P1),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.231(C10E3R3P2),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.231(C636E3R3P1);Versions earlier than 10.1.0.225(C431E3R1P2),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.225(C432E3R1P2) contain an information vulnerability. A module has a design error that is lack of control of input. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to obtain some information. This can lead to information leak.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA module in HONOR 20 PRO smartphones contains an information disclosure vulnerability due to a design error lacking proper input control. Attackers can exploit this to obtain sensitive information through unspecified attack vectors, likely involving crafted input to an affected module.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.1.0.230\(c432e9r5p1\)< 10.1.0.231\(c10e3r3p2\)< 10.1.0.231\(c185e3r5p1\)< 10.1.0.231\(c636e3r3p1\)< 10.1.0.212\(c432e10r3p4\)< 10.1.0.213\(c636e3r4p3\)< 10.1.0.214\(c10e5r4p3\)< 10.1.0.214\(c185e3r3p3\)< 10.1.0.212\(c00e210r5p1\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p11\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p11\)< 10.1.0.160\(c01e160r2p11\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p11\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r8p12\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your device modelGo to Settings > About Phone > Model Name (or Device name) and verify it matches one of these affected models: Honor 20 Pro, Honor View 20, Oxford (An00a), Princeton (Al10b, Al10d, Tl10c), Tony (Al00b), or Yale (Al00a)Affected if Device model is not one of the listed affected models, then not vulnerable
-
Locate firmware version informationGo to Settings > About Phone > Version. Look for the build number displayed (typically shows as something like 10.1.0.xxx with a suffix in parentheses)Affected if Cannot access version information through standard Android settings
-
Determine your specific build variantIn Settings > About Phone > Build Number or Software Version, identify the full build identifier which includes the alphanumeric suffix (for example: C432E9R5P1, C10E3R3P2, C185E3R5P1, C636E3R3P1, or similar)Affected if Build suffix cannot be determined from the device settings
-
Compare version against affected ranges for Honor 20 ProIf the device is Honor 20 Pro, check if the firmware version is lower than 10.1.0.230 with suffix C432E9R5P1, OR lower than 10.1.0.231 with any of these suffixes: C10E3R3P2, C185E3R5P1, C636E3R3P1Affected if Firmware version matches or exceeds all four listed version thresholds for Honor 20 Pro, then likely not vulnerable
-
Compare version against affected ranges for Honor View 20If the device is Honor View 20, check if firmware is lower than 10.1.0.212(C432E10R3P4), lower than 10.1.0.213(C636E3R4P3), or lower than 10.1.0.214 with suffixes C10E5R4P3 or C185E3R3P3Affected if Firmware version matches or exceeds all four listed version thresholds for Honor View 20, then likely not vulnerable
-
Compare version against affected ranges for other Huawei modelsFor Oxford An00a, check < 10.1.0.212(C00E210R5P1). For Princeton Al10b/Al10d, Princeton Tl10c, Tony Al00b, and Yale Al00a, check < 10.1.0.160 with their respective suffixes as listed in the affected versionsAffected if Firmware version meets or exceeds the listed threshold for that specific model, then likely not vulnerable
The device is affected if it is one of the listed Honor/Huawei models AND its firmware version (including build suffix) is lower than the specified threshold version for that model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.1.0.16010.1.0.21210.1.0.213
Apply the vendor-provided firmware updates (10.1.0.230 for C432E9R5P1, 10.1.0.231 for C10E3R3P2/C636E3R3P1/C185E3R5P1, and corresponding versions for other builds) to patched versions.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9235 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9235 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data