CVE-2020-9244
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHUAWEI Mate 20 versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R3P8);HUAWEI Mate 20 Pro versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.270(C431E7R1P5),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.270(C635E3R1P5),Versions earlier than 10.1.0.273(C636E7R2P4);HUAWEI Mate 20 X versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P8);HUAWEI P30 versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P11);HUAWEI P30 Pro versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C00E160R2P8);HUAWEI Mate 20 RS versions Versions earlier than 10.1.0.160(C786E160R3P8);HonorMagic2 versions Versions earlier than 10.0.0.187(C00E61R2P11);Honor20 versions Versions earlier than 10.0.0.175(C00E58R4P11);Honor20 PRO versions Versions earlier than 10.0.0.194(C00E62R8P12);HonorMagic2 versions Versions earlier than 10.0.0.187(C00E61R2P11);HonorV20 versions Versions earlier than 10.0.0.188(C00E62R2P11) have an improper authentication vulnerability. The system does not properly sign certain encrypted file, the attacker should gain the key used to encrypt the file, successful exploit could cause certain file be forged
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the file encryption/signing mechanism of affected Huawei devices. The system does not properly sign certain encrypted files, allowing an attacker who obtains the encryption key to forge files. This is an authentication/integrity weakness with CVSS 6.8 indicating moderate exploitability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r3p8\)< 10.1.0.270\(c431e7r1p5\)< 10.1.0.270\(c635e3r1p5\)< 10.1.0.273\(c636e7r2p4\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p8\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p11\)< 10.1.0.160\(c00e160r2p8\)< 10.1.0.160\(c786e160r3p8\)< 10.0.0.187\(c00e61r2p11\)< 10.0.0.175\(c00e58r4p11\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Huawei device modelCheck the device settings under Settings > About Phone > Model to confirm it is one of: Mate 20, Mate 20 Pro, Mate 20 X, P30, P30 Pro, Mate 20 Rs, Honor Magic 2, or Honor 20Affected if The device model is NOT one of the listed affected models (you are not affected)
-
Check Mate 20 firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version > Build Number. Compare the version number against the affected thresholds: Mate 20 requires 10.1.0.160(c00e160r3p8) or higherAffected if The firmware version is lower than 10.1.0.160(c00e160r3p8)
-
Check Mate 20 Pro firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version > Build Number. Compare the version number against the affected thresholds: 10.1.0.270(c431e7r1p5), 10.1.0.270(c635e3r1p5), or 10.1.0.273(c636e7r2p4) or higherAffected if The firmware version is lower than any of the three threshold versions listed for your variant
-
Check Mate 20 X firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version > Build Number. Compare the version number against the affected threshold: 10.1.0.160(c00e160r2p8)Affected if The firmware version is lower than 10.1.0.160(c00e160r2p8)
-
Check P30/P30 Pro firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version > Build Number. Compare the version number against the affected thresholds: P30 requires 10.1.0.160(c00e160r2p11) or higher, P30 Pro requires 10.1.0.160(c00e160r2p8) or higherAffected if The firmware version is lower than the specified threshold for your model
-
Check Honor device firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version > Build Number. Compare: Honor Magic 2 requires 10.0.0.187(c00e61r2p11) or higher, Honor 20 requires 10.0.0.175(c00e58r4p11) or higherAffected if The firmware version is lower than the specified threshold for your Honor model
You are affected if your device model is Mate 20, Mate 20 Pro, Mate 20 X, P30, P30 Pro, Mate 20 Rs, Honor Magic 2, or Honor 20 AND your firmware version is below the corresponding threshold listed for that model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.0.0.17510.0.0.18710.1.0.160
Apply the vendor-provided firmware updates that address this vulnerability for each affected device model and variant listed.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9244 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data