SilverstripeApplication

CVE-2020-9280

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In SilverStripe through 4.5, files uploaded via Forms to folders migrated from Silverstripe CMS 3.x may be put to the default "/Uploads" folder instead. This affects installations which allowed upload folder protection via the optional silverstripe/secureassets module under 3.x. This module is installed and enabled by default on the Common Web Platform (CWP). The vulnerability only affects files uploaded after an upgrade to 4.x.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In SilverStripe 4.x, when upgrading from 3.x installations that used the optional silverstripe/secureassets module for upload folder protection, files uploaded via Forms may be placed in the default publicly-accessible '/Uploads' folder instead of the intended protected folder. This occurs because folder protection settings from 3.x migrations are not properly preserved in 4.x, leading to potential disclosure of sensitive files that should have been protected.

MitigationAfter upgrading from SilverStripe 3.x to 4.x, verify that Form upload destinations point to the correct protected folders and manually configure folder protection as needed. Identify and relocate any files incorrectly placed in /Uploads that should have been in protected folders.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SilverstripeApplication
Affected:>= 4.0.0, <= 4.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed SilverStripe version
    Run `composer show silverstripe/framework` or inspect composer.lock to find the installed version number
    Affected if Version is >= 4.0.0 and <= 4.5.0
  2. Determine if this is a migrated installation
    Check if the site was upgraded from SilverStripe 3.x by reviewing upgrade history, git logs, or asking the site administrator
    Affected if The installation was upgraded from SilverStripe 3.x that used the silverstripe/secureassets module
  3. Verify if Form upload fields exist
    Search codebase for FileField, UploadField, or form configuration files (mysite/code/*.php) that handle file uploads
    Affected if The application uses Form upload fields to accept user files
  4. Inspect upload folder destination configuration
    Review upload field configurations in PHP code and the Assets configuration (admin panel or config files) to identify the upload destination folder
    Affected if Upload destination defaults to /Uploads or is not explicitly set to a protected folder
  5. Check for files incorrectly placed in /Uploads
    Examine the /Uploads folder in the assets directory and compare against files that should have been placed in protected folders based on form logic
    Affected if Sensitive files exist in /Uploads that should have been in protected folders based on the application's security requirements

You are affected if running SilverStripe 4.0.0-4.5.0, upgraded from a 3.x installation with secureassets, and form uploads are landing in the default /Uploads folder instead of protected locations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.5.0
Interim mitigation

After upgrading from SilverStripe 3.x to 4.x, verify that Form upload destinations point to the correct protected folders and manually configure folder protection as needed. Identify and relocate any files incorrectly placed in /Uploads that should have been in protected folders.

Fix this in Silverstripe Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9280 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data