Fortiadc FirmwareOperating system · Fortinet

CVE-2020-9286

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.3.4 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An improper authorization vulnerability in FortiADC may allow a remote authenticated user with low privileges to perform certain actions such as rebooting the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

FortiADC contains an improper authorization vulnerability where a remote authenticated user with low privileges can perform elevated actions such as system reboot that should require higher privilege levels. This represents a privilege escalation flaw in the application's authorization logic.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch from Fortinet for FortiADC. Until patched, limit network access to the management interface to trusted administrators only and monitor for unauthorized administrative actions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Fortiadc FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 5.3.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed FortiADC firmware version
    Access the FortiADC CLI or GUI and run the command 'get system status' or navigate to System > Firmware to view the current firmware version
    Affected if The firmware version is 5.3.4 or any version lower than 5.3.4
  2. Identify low-privilege user accounts
    In FortiADC GUI, go to System > Administrator > Administrators to list all admin accounts and their privilege profiles. In CLI, use 'get admin user' to view user configurations
    Affected if There are administrator accounts assigned to low-privilege or limited profiles that should not have system-level permissions
  3. Verify authorization controls for elevated actions
    Review the privilege profiles assigned to each administrator. Check which profiles have permission to execute system-level commands such as reboot, shutdown, or configuration changes. Use 'get system privilege' or inspect profile configurations under User > User Group > Admin Profile
    Affected if Low-privilege profiles are incorrectly granted permissions to execute elevated system operations like reboot or system configuration changes
  4. Audit administrative logs for unauthorized elevated actions
    In FortiADC GUI, go to Log & Report > System Events or use CLI command 'execute log view' to search for reboot or system-level commands. Look for actions performed by accounts with low-privilege profiles
    Affected if Logs show system reboot, shutdown, or other elevated actions were performed by users with low-privilege profiles that should not have such permissions

You are affected if your FortiADC firmware is version 5.3.4 or lower AND low-privilege users can perform elevated actions like system reboot that should require higher privilege levels.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.3.4
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch from Fortinet for FortiADC. Until patched, limit network access to the management interface to trusted administrators only and monitor for unauthorized administrative actions.

Fix this in Fortiadc Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9286 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9286 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data