CVE-2020-9295
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFortiOS 6.2 running AV engine version 6.00142 and below, FortiOS 6.4 running AV engine version 6.00144 and below and FortiClient 6.2 running AV engine version 6.00137 and below may not immediately detect certain types of malformed or non-standard RAR archives, potentially containing malicious files. Based on the samples provided, FortiClient will detect the malicious files upon trying extraction by real-time scanning and FortiGate will detect the malicious archive if Virus Outbreak Prevention is enabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FortiOS and FortiClient antivirus engines versions 6.00142/6.00144/6.00137 and below fail to immediately detect malformed or non-standard RAR archives containing malicious files during initial scanning. While FortiClient can detect the payload upon extraction via real-time scanning and FortiGate can detect it if Virus Outbreak Prevention is enabled, the initial scan point misses these specially crafted archives.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.00145CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Fortinet Antivirus Engine version on FortiOSRun the command: get system status (or diagnose sys endpoint info) to retrieve the AV engine version fieldAffected if The displayed Antivirus Engine version is below 6.00145
-
Check Fortinet Antivirus Engine version on FortiClientOpen FortiClient console, go to About or Settings > About to view the Antivirus Engine versionAffected if The displayed Antivirus Engine version is below 6.00145
-
Verify if initial RAR archive scanning is enabledOn FortiOS: check scan configuration via 'config antivirus profile' or examine if archive scanning is set to 'full' or 'archive' mode. On FortiClient: verify real-time protection settings in the scan profileAffected if Archive scanning (specifically for RAR files) is enabled as part of initial scan without relying solely on Virus Outbreak Prevention or extraction-time scanning
-
Confirm RAR handling behavior in scan profileReview antivirus profile settings for RAR archive handling: run 'get antivirus profile' or inspect the archive-scan settings in the GUI under AV profilesAffected if RAR archives are processed during the initial scan phase rather than being deferred to extraction-time or real-time scanning only
You are affected if your Fortinet Antivirus Engine version is below 6.00145 AND your configuration relies on initial scanning of RAR archives (without Virus Outbreak Prevention or extraction-time detection as the primary detection method).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.00145
Update FortiOS to AV engine version 6.00143 or higher (6.2) / 6.00145 or higher (6.4), and FortiClient to version 6.00138 or higher. Alternatively, enable Virus Outbreak Prevention on FortiGate devices as a compensating control.
Antivirus Engine 6.00145 or higher
- Upgrade FortiOS AV engine to version 6.00145 or higher for FortiOS 6.2 and 6.4
- Upgrade FortiClient 6.2 AV engine to version 6.00145 or higher
- After upgrade, verify the AV engine version meets the minimum requirement of 6.00145
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9295 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9295 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data