CVE-2020-9545
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPale Moon 28.x before 28.8.4 has a segmentation fault related to module scripting, as demonstrated by a Lacoste web site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA segmentation fault vulnerability exists in Pale Moon browser versions 28.x before 28.8.4, triggered during module scripting operations. The crash occurs when visiting a malicious website containing specially crafted module script content, indicating a memory handling flaw in the browser's JavaScript module loading mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 28.0, < 28.8.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Pale Moon versionOpen Pale Moon, go to Help > About Pale Moon, or look at the application binary properties. The version number is displayed in the About window.Affected if The version shown is 28.0, 28.1.x, 28.2.x, 28.3.x, 28.4.x, 28.5.x, 28.6.x, 28.7.x, or any 28.8.0-28.8.3 release (anything below 28.8.4).
-
Confirm JavaScript is enabled in the browserGo to Tools > Options > Content, or enter about:config in the address bar and search for javascript.enabled. Verify the setting is true.Affected if JavaScript is enabled (javascript.enabled = true), as the vulnerability is triggered through malicious module script content loaded via JavaScript.
-
Check for any custom content security policiesIn about:config, search for security.csp. Inspect whether custom policies exist that might restrict module script loading.Affected if No restrictive Content Security Policy is set that blocks module scripts, as the exploit requires the browser to process module script content.
You are affected if your Pale Moon version is 28.0 or any version from 28.1.0 through 28.8.3, and JavaScript execution is enabled in the browser settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data28.8.4
Upgrade Pale Moon to version 28.8.4 or later. Until updated, avoid visiting untrusted websites or disable JavaScript execution as a defensive measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9545 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9545 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data