CVE-2021-0186
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input validation in the Intel(R) SGX SDK applications compiled for SGX2 enabled processors may allow a privileged user to potentially escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper input validation in Intel SGX SDK applications compiled for SGX2-enabled processors allows a privileged local user to potentially escalate privileges. The vulnerability stems from inadequate validation of inputs within SGX enclaves running on SGX2 hardware, which could be exploited to gain elevated access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.12<= 2.13all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Intel SGX SDK versionOn Linux: dpkg -l | grep sgx-sdk or ls /opt/intel/sgxsdk/VERSION. On Windows: Check the installation directory or registry for SGX SDK version.Affected if The installed version is 2.12 or lower, or 2.13 or lower (e.g., 2.12.100, 2.13.0)
-
Identify SGX enclave applicationsLocate compiled enclave binaries (.so on Linux, .dll on Windows) in application directories, typically named with 'enclave' in the filename or stored in /usr/lib/sgx or similar paths.Affected if SGX enclave applications exist on the system that were compiled with the vulnerable SDK version
-
Verify processor SGX2 supportOn Linux: cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i sgx. On Windows: Use CPU-Z or the 'wmic cpu get caption' command and cross-reference with Intel ARK for SGX2 capability.Affected if The processor supports SGX2 (not just SGX1) - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Check SGX enclave configurationInspect the enclave configuration file (usually config.xml or similar within the enclave project) for EAUG (Enclave Attribute for User-allocated Pages) or dynamic memory allocation settings that are used with SGX2.Affected if SGX enclaves are configured to use dynamic memory allocation or EAUG features (SGX2-specific features)
-
Review SGX driver and platform firmware versionOn Linux: cat /sys/class/sgx/version or check BIOS/UEFI firmware version for the listed Xeon processors.Affected if Running on affected Xeon hardware (Gold 6342, 6346, 6330, 6354, 6314u, 6338n or Platinum 8360y) with unpatched firmware
You are affected if you have SGX enclave applications compiled with Intel SGX SDK version 2.13 or earlier, running on SGX2-capable hardware (particularly affected Xeon processors), with enclaves using dynamic memory features.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest Intel SGX SDK version containing the fix and recompile affected SGX applications; verify SGX enclave functionality after remediation.
Intel SGX SDK version 2.14 or later
- 1. Identify the current Intel SGX SDK version installed by checking the SDK version or build configuration
- 2. Download the latest Intel SGX SDK from the official Intel website or GitHub repository (intel/sgx-sdk)
- 3. Upgrade the SGX SDK to version 2.14 or later, as versions 2.12 and 2.13 (and earlier) are affected by this vulnerability
- 4. Recompile all SGX applications with the updated SDK to incorporate the input validation fixes
- 5. For affected Xeon processor firmware, check Intel's processor firmware update page or Intel SGX platform software for available firmware updates addressing this vulnerability
- 6. Apply firmware updates through the appropriate Intel firmware update mechanisms or server vendor tools
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0186 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0186 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data