Junos Os EvolvedOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2021-0226

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-04-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
On Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved devices, receipt of a specific IPv6 packet may cause an established IPv6 BGP session to terminate, creating a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue does not affect IPv4 BGP sessions. This issue affects IBGP or EBGP peer sessions with IPv6. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved: 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S3-EVO; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S3-EVO; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2-S1-EVO; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-EVO. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS releases.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A specific IPv6 packet can cause established IPv6 BGP sessions to terminate on Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved devices, creating a sustained Denial of Service condition. The vulnerability affects IBGP and EBGP peer sessions using IPv6 transport, while IPv4 BGP sessions are unaffected.

MitigationUpgrade Junos OS Evolved to version 19.4R2-S3-EVO, 20.1R2-S3-EVO, 20.2R2-S1-EVO, 20.3R2-EVO or later. Consider implementing BGP session monitoring and filtering as an interim measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Junos Os EvolvedOperating system
Affected:= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device OS and version
    Run 'show version' or 'system version' to confirm the device runs Junos OS Evolved and note the exact version number (e.g., 20.1, 20.2, 20.3)
    Affected if The version matches exactly 20.1, 20.2, or 20.3 as listed in affected versions
  2. Check for IPv6 BGP configuration
    Run 'show configuration protocols bgp | display set' and look for 'family inet6' or 'family inet6-vpn' under the BGP group configuration
    Affected if IPv6 address family is configured under any BGP group (indicates IPv6 BGP peers exist)
  3. Verify active IPv6 BGP sessions
    Run 'show bgp summary' and examine the 'Neighbour' column for IPv6 addresses, or run 'show bgp neighbor | match "Peer: "' to list all peer addresses
    Affected if Any BGP neighbors use IPv6 addresses (fe80:, link-local, or global unicast) - these sessions are vulnerable to termination
  4. Confirm IPv6 transport is in use for BGP
    Run 'show bgp neighbor <ipv6-address>' and verify the 'Transport' or 'Local Interface' shows an IPv6 interface, or check 'show bgp summary' for IPv6 neighbor entries under the IPv6 unicast address family
    Affected if BGP sessions are established over IPv6 transport - this is the exact condition the CVE exploits

A device is affected if it runs Junos OS Evolved versions 20.1, 20.2, or 20.3 AND has any active IPv6 BGP peer sessions (IBGP or EBGP), regardless of whether sessions are currently up or have recently terminated abnormally.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Junos OS Evolved to version 19.4R2-S3-EVO, 20.1R2-S3-EVO, 20.2R2-S1-EVO, 20.3R2-EVO or later. Consider implementing BGP session monitoring and filtering as an interim measure.

Fix this in Junos Os Evolved Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0226 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0226 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data