CVE-2021-0246
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, SRX5000 Series with SPC2/SPC3, devices using tenant services on Juniper Networks Junos OS, due to incorrect default permissions assigned to tenant system administrators a tenant system administrator may inadvertently send their network traffic to one or more tenants while concurrently modifying the overall device system traffic management, affecting all tenants and the service provider. Further, a tenant may inadvertently receive traffic from another tenant. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 18.3 version 18.3R1 and later versions on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, SRX5000 Series with SPC2; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3 on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, SRX5000 Series with SPC2; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2 on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, SRX5000 Series with SPC2/SPC3; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2 on SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, SRX5000 Series with SPC2/SPC3. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 18.3R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a tenant isolation vulnerability in Junos OS SRX series devices (SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, SRX5000) with SPC2/SPC3 cards. Incorrect default permissions assigned to tenant system administrators allow them to inadvertently send network traffic to other tenants while modifying overall device system traffic management, breaking tenant isolation and potentially exposing traffic between tenants.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SRX device modelRun 'show system information' or 'show chassis hardware' to confirm the device is an SRX1500, SRX4100, SRX4200, SRX4600, or SRX5000Affected if Device model is one of these affected SRX series models
-
Verify SPC2 or SPC3 card presenceRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show chassis fpc' to identify installed SPC cardsAffected if SPC2 or SPC3 cards are installed in the device
-
Check installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the exact Junos OS version numberAffected if Version is 18.3 (any release), 18.4 (any release), or 19.1 (any release)
-
Identify tenant system administratorsRun 'show system login' or 'show configuration system login' to list all configured login accounts and their classes, particularly looking for accounts assigned to tenant administration rolesAffected if Tenant system administrator accounts exist with elevated permissions that could affect system-wide traffic management
-
Verify tenant isolation configurationRun 'show logical-systems' or 'show configuration logical-systems' to review tenant logical system definitions and their traffic separation settingsAffected if Multiple logical systems or tenant systems are configured without proper isolation controls between them
Device is affected if it is an SRX1500/4100/4200/4600/5000 with SPC2/SPC3 cards running Junos OS version 18.3, 18.4, or 19.1 and has tenant system administrators configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Junos OS to version 18.3R3, 18.4R2, 19.1R2 or later (depending on the current branch) to receive the corrected default permissions for tenant system administrators. Verify tenant isolation after upgrade.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,024.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0246 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0246 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data