CVE-2021-0249
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn SRX Series devices configured with UTM services a buffer overflow vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS may allow an attacker to arbitrarily execute code or commands on the target to take over or otherwise impact the device by sending crafted packets to or through the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series: 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D190; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S9; 17.4R3 and later versions prior to 18.1R3-S9; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S1; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S3, 18.3R3; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S3, 18.4R3; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S4, 19.1R2; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S1, 19.2R2. An indicator of compromise can be the following text in the UTM log: RT_UTM: AV_FILE_NOT_SCANNED_PASSED_MT:
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices with UTM services enabled. Remote attackers can achieve arbitrary code execution by sending crafted packets to or through the affected device. This critical flaw (CVSS 9.8) affects multiple version branches of Junos OS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.1x49= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an SRX Series firewallAffected if Device is not an SRX Series device - this vulnerability only affects SRX Series
-
Verify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version matches 15.1x49, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, or 19.2 (any variant within these branches)
-
Confirm UTM is enabledRun 'show utm status' or check the configuration with 'show configuration | display set | match utm'Affected if UTM (Unified Threat Management) services are actively enabled on the device - the vulnerability requires UTM to be running
-
Inspect UTM logs for compromise indicatorsRun 'show log messages | match RT_UTM' or review UTM audit logs for the string 'RT_UTM: AV_FILE_NOT_SCANNED_PASSED_MT:'Affected if This specific log signature is present, indicating potential exploitation activity
Device is affected if it is an SRX Series firewall running a vulnerable Junos version (15.1x49 through 19.2) with UTM services enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to the patched versions specified (15.1X49-D190, 17.4R2-S9, 18.1R3-S9, 18.2R3-S1, 18.3R2-S3/18.3R3, 18.4R2-S3/18.4R3, 19.1R1-S4/19.1R2, 19.2R1-S1/19.2R2). Review UTM logs for indicator 'RT_UTM: AV_FILE_NOT_SCANNED_PASSED_MT:' as a potential compromise indicator.
Upgrade to a fixed Junos OS release (e.g., 15.1X49-D190, 17.4R2‑S9, 18.1R3‑S9, 18.2R3‑S1, 18.3R2‑S3, 18.4R2‑S3, 19.1R1‑S4, or 19.2R1‑S1) or later.
- Run 'show version' to determine the currently installed Junos OS version.
- Verify if the device is configured with UTM (e.g., 'show configuration | display set | match utm').
- Review the list of vulnerable versions and confirm that the current version is affected.
- Plan the upgrade: identify the appropriate fixed release from Juniper's documentation (e.g., 15.1X49-D190, 17.4R2‑S9, 18.1R3‑S9, 18.2R3‑S1, 18.3R2‑S3, 18.4R2‑S3, 19.1R1‑S4, 19.2R1‑S1).
- Back up the current configuration and system image (e.g., 'save /var/tmp/config.boot').
- Download the Junos OS software package for the selected fixed release from the Juniper Networks support portal.
- Transfer the package to the SRX device (e.g., using SCP or FTP to /var/tmp/).
- Install the software using 'request system software add <path> no-copy' (e.g., 'request system software add /var/tmp/junos‑os‑18.2R3‑S1‑signed.tgz no-copy').
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0249 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0249 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data