CVE-2021-0259
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to a vulnerability in DDoS protection in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved on QFX5K Series switches in a VXLAN configuration, instability might be experienced in the underlay network as a consequence of exceeding the default ddos-protection aggregate threshold. If an attacker on a client device on the overlay network sends a high volume of specific, legitimate traffic in the overlay network, due to an improperly detected DDoS violation, the leaf might not process certain L2 traffic, sent by spines in the underlay network. Continued receipt and processing of the high volume traffic will sustain the Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX5K Series: 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S11; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R3-S5; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S13; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2-S8, 18.2R3-S8; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S5; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S6, 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S4; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S6, 19.2R3-S2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S2; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S4, 19.4R3-S1; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R1-S2, 20.3R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on QFX5220: All versions prior to 20.3R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the DDoS protection mechanism on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved for QFX5K Series switches in VXLAN configurations causes improper detection of DDoS violations. When an attacker sends high volumes of legitimate-looking traffic across the overlay network, the system incorrectly triggers DDoS protection, causing the leaf switches to drop legitimate L2 traffic from spines in the underlay network, resulting in sustained DoS conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 17.3= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 18.3= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check the device model. This vulnerability only affects QFX5K Series switches.Affected if Device is NOT a QFX5K Series switch - likely not affected
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos version. Compare against the affected ranges: Junos 17.3 through 20.2, or Junos OS Evolved 18.3 through 20.3.Affected if Installed version falls within the listed affected versions and no fixed version is applied
-
Verify VXLAN configurationRun 'show configuration protocols vxlan' or 'show configuration protocols evpn' to check if VXLAN overlay is configured.Affected if VXLAN overlay network is NOT configured - likely not affected since the flaw requires overlay traffic to trigger
-
Confirm DDoS protection is activeRun 'show ddos protection statistics' or check 'show configuration protocols ddos-protection' to verify DDoS protection is enabled on the device.Affected if DDoS protection is disabled - the vulnerability cannot be triggered
A defender is affected if they run a QFX5K Series switch with an affected Junos version AND have VXLAN overlay with DDoS protection enabled, as the flaw requires the overlay network and DDoS mechanism to be present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Junos OS to one of the specified fixed versions (17.3R3-S11, 17.4R3-S5, 18.1R3-S13, 18.2R2-S8/18.2R3-S8, 18.3R3-S5, 18.4R1-S8/18.4R2-S6/18.4R3-S6, 19.1R3-S4, 19.2R1-S6/19.2R3-S2, 19.3R3-S2, 19.4R2-S4/19.4R3-S1, 20.1R2, 20.2R2, 20.3R1-S2/20.3R2, or 20.3R2-EVO for Evolved) or consider adjusting DDoS protection thresholds as a temporary mitigation if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0259 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0259 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data