CVE-2021-0266
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe use of multiple hard-coded cryptographic keys in cSRX Series software in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to take control of any instance of a cSRX deployment through device management services. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on cSRX Series: All versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple hard-coded cryptographic keys in Juniper cSRX Series containerized firewall software allow remote attackers to take control of any cSRX instance through device management services by using the known static cryptographic secrets to authenticate or decrypt traffic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify cSRX Series hardware or virtual instanceRun 'show chassis hardware' or check system documentation to confirm the device is a cSRX containerized firewall Series modelAffected if The device is NOT a cSRX Series model - other Juniper products are not affected by this specific hard-coded key vulnerability
-
Check installed Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' or 'show version detail' at the Junos CLI prompt and note the exact version number displayedAffected if The installed Junos version equals exactly 20.2, 20.3, or 20.4 - only these specific versions contain the hard-coded cryptographic keys
-
Verify device management services are enabledAt the Junos CLI, run 'show configuration system services' to view enabled management protocols such as SSH, NETCONF, or web management, and check 'show configuration interfaces' for management IP assignmentsAffected if Any device management service (SSH, NETCONF, web UI) is enabled and reachable - this exposes the cSRX to authentication using the hard-coded keys
-
Check network exposure of management interfacesReview firewall filter configurations and interface policies using 'show configuration firewall' and 'show configuration interfaces' to determine if management interfaces are exposed to untrusted networksAffected if Management services are accessible from non-internal networks - remote attackers can exploit the hard-coded keys over exposed management channels
A cSRX Series device running Junos version 20.2, 20.3, or 20.4 with device management services enabled and network accessibility is vulnerable to remote compromise via the hard-coded cryptographic keys.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS on cSRX Series to version 20.2R3, 20.3R2, 20.4R2 or later to remove the hard-coded keys. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to device management services using network segmentation or firewall rules.
Upgrade to Junos OS 20.2R3, 20.3R2, 20.4R2 or later releases on cSRX Series
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the cSRX device using 'show version' command
- 2. Confirm the device is running a vulnerable version (20.2, 20.3, or 20.4 before the R2/R3 releases)
- 3. Backup the current configuration using 'request system configuration rescue save' or 'file copy' to external storage
- 4. Review the Junos release notes for 20.2R3, 20.3R2, or 20.4R2 (whichever branch you plan to upgrade to) for any specific upgrade requirements
- 5. Download the appropriate Junos software image for cSRX from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 6. Transfer the software image to the cSRX device
- 7. Initiate the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' command
- 8. Reboot the device after upgrade completes using 'request system reboot'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0266 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0266 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data