AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2021-0539

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In archiveStoredConversation of MmsService.java, there is a possible way to archive message conversation without user consent due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-180419673

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In archiveStoredConversation of MmsService.java on Android-11, a missing permission check allows a local application to archive message conversations without user consent, leading to local escalation of privilege. An app can exploit this without any additional execution privileges or user interaction.

MitigationApply the Google security patch for CVE-2021-0539 which adds proper permission validation before allowing conversation archival in MmsService.java.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 11.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Android version is 11.0
    Run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' in adb shell or check Settings > About Phone > Android version
    Affected if The version returned is 11.0 (any build) - versions other than 11.0 are not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Verify MmsService component exists
    Check for MmsService in system services via 'dumpsys -l | grep MmsService' or inspect the framework JAR at /system/framework/framework.jar for MmsService.java class
    Affected if MmsService is present and loaded on the device - the vulnerable code path exists in this component
  3. Check if messaging permissions are properly enforced
    Review the MmsService.java source code (if available) or decompile the framework to verify archiveStoredConversation method contains a permission check (e.g., android.permission.MANAGE_MESSAGES or similar) before allowing conversation archival
    Affected if The archiveStoredConversation method lacks a permission check - the vulnerability is present and exploitable
  4. Identify exposed broadcast receivers or intents
    Use 'dumpsys package' to list broadcast receivers for android.permission.MANAGE_MESSAGES or check if any component accepts archive conversation intents without permission validation
    Affected if An app can send an intent to archive conversations without holding required permissions, confirming the missing check

If the device runs Android 11.0 and the MmsService archiveStoredConversation method lacks proper permission validation, the device is vulnerable to local privilege escalation via unauthorized conversation archival.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Google security patch for CVE-2021-0539 which adds proper permission validation before allowing conversation archival in MmsService.java.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0539 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data