CVE-2021-1539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the authorization process of Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software (StarOS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to bypass authorization and execute a subset of CLI commands on an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability allows an authenticated remote attacker to bypass authorization checks in Cisco ASR 5000 Series StarOS software, enabling execution of CLI commands outside their granted privilege level. The attacker needs valid credentials but can leverage the flaw to run commands they are not authorized to execute.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.16.9>= 21.17.0, < 21.17.10>= 21.18.0, < 21.18.16>= 21.19.0, < 21.19.11>= 21.19.n, < 21.19.n7>= 21.20.0, < 21.20.8all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and software versionLog into the CLI and run 'show version' or check the system banner to confirm whether the device is running Cisco StarOS (ASR 5000 Series) or Virtualized Packet CoreAffected if The device runs Cisco StarOS or Virtualized Packet Core and the version falls outside the fixed releases (21.16.9, 21.17.10, 21.18.16, 21.19.11, 21.20.8 or later)
-
Compare StarOS version against affected rangesIf running StarOS, note the full version number from 'show version' output and compare it against the affected ranges: < 21.16.9, >= 21.17.0 and < 21.17.10, >= 21.18.0 and < 21.18.16, >= 21.19.0 and < 21.19.11, >= 21.20.0 and < 21.20.8Affected if The installed StarOS version matches any of these ranges, or for Virtualized Packet Core, any version is running
-
Confirm CLI authentication is enabledReview the CLI access configuration by running 'show configuration' or checking the admin user account settings to verify that remote or local CLI authentication is activeAffected if CLI access is enabled with valid user accounts, providing the attacker with the credentials needed to exploit the authorization bypass
-
Audit CLI command logs for privilege escalationReview system logs, audit logs, or run 'show logs' to examine recent CLI command execution history, looking for commands executed by users operating outside their expected privilege levelAffected if Logs show commands executed by users that should not be permitted based on their assigned privilege group or role
The environment is affected if the device runs Cisco StarOS in any version before 21.16.9, 21.17.10, 21.18.16, 21.19.11, or 21.20.8, or runs any version of Virtualized Packet Core, and CLI access with valid credentials is available.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.16.921.17.1021.18.16
Apply the vendor patch from Cisco for this authorization bypass; until patched, strictly limit CLI access to trusted administrators only and monitor for anomalous command execution.
StarOS 21.16.9, 21.17.10, 21.18.16, or 21.19.11 (or later) | Virtualized Packet Core: contact Cisco for specific fix
- 1. Identify the current StarOS version running on the affected Cisco ASR 5000 Series device
- 2. For StarOS: Upgrade to version 21.16.9 or later, 21.17.10 or later, 21.18.16 or later, or 21.19.11 or later
- 3. For Virtualized Packet Core: Contact Cisco for specific patch/upgrade guidance as no fixed version range was specified in the advisory
- 4. After upgrade, verify the authorization bypass is resolved by testing CLI command execution with limited-privilege accounts
- 5. Review user authorization roles and permissions to ensure proper access controls are in place
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data