CVE-2021-20040
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA relative path traversal vulnerability in the SMA100 upload funtion allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to upload crafted web pages or files as a 'nobody' user. This vulnerability affected SMA 200, 210, 400, 410 and 500v appliances.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA relative path traversal vulnerability exists in the SMA100 series appliances' file upload function, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to bypass path validation and upload arbitrary files to arbitrary locations on the system. The uploaded files are created with 'nobody' user privileges, which could enable web shell deployment or further privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.2.0.8-37sv= 10.2.1.1-19sv= 10.2.0.8-37sv= 10.2.1.1-19sv= 10.2.0.8-37sv= 10.2.1.1-19sv= 10.2.0.8-37sv= 10.2.1.1-19sv= 10.2.0.8-37sv= 10.2.1.1-19svCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SMA appliance modelAccess the SMA device web interface or use the command line interface (CLI) to retrieve the hardware model number. Look for SMA 200, SMA 210, SMA 400, SMA 410, or SMA 500v designations in the system information or device status page.Affected if The model is one of: SMA 200, SMA 210, SMA 400, SMA 410, or SMA 500v.
-
Retrieve firmware versionIn the SMA web interface, navigate to System > Status or Device > About to view the installed firmware version. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'sysctl -a' or check '/etc/version' via SSH to obtain the exact firmware build number.Affected if The firmware version matches exactly 10.2.0.8-37sv or 10.2.1.1-19sv.
-
Verify management interface accessibilityDetermine if the SMA web management interface (typically ports 443 or 8443) is accessible from untrusted networks. Review firewall rules, VPN policies, and network segmentation configurations to confirm whether the interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted internal segments.Affected if The SMA management interface is reachable from untrusted network segments or the public internet without proper access controls.
-
Inspect for files owned by nobody userAccess the SMA device via SSH and use 'find / -user nobody -type f 2>/dev/null' to list files created by the 'nobody' user. Check directories such as /var/www/html, /tmp, and user-upload directories for unexpected files.Affected if Unexpected files or scripts (especially .php, .sh, or executable files) exist on the system and are owned by the 'nobody' user.
-
Review web root for suspicious scriptsExamine the web document root directories (/var/www/html, /www, or similar) for unfamiliar PHP files, web shells, or uploaded artifacts. Use 'ls -la' to list files and check modification timestamps around the time of potential exploitation.Affected if Unknown PHP files, web shells, or scripts appear in web-accessible directories, particularly with recent creation or modification dates.
A defender is affected if they operate a SMA 200, 210, 400, 410, or 500v appliance running firmware version 10.2.0.8-37sv or 10.2.1.1-19sv, with the management interface accessible to untrusted networks, and unauthorized files owned by 'nobody' exist on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches for SMA 200, 210, 400, 410, and 500v appliances; if patches unavailable, restrict external access to the SMA management interface via network segmentation or firewall rules.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20040 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20040 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data