CVE-2021-20204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap memory corruption problem (use after free) can be triggered in libgetdata v0.10.0 when processing maliciously crafted dirfile databases. This degrades the confidentiality, integrity and availability of third-party software that uses libgetdata as a library. This vulnerability may lead to arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation depending on input/skills of attacker.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free heap memory corruption vulnerability exists in libgetdata v0.10.0 when processing maliciously crafted dirfile databases. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management where memory is freed but still referenced, leading to heap corruption that can be exploited for arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 33= 34= 35= 0.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if libgetdata library is installedOn Debian: dpkg -l | grep libgetdata. On Fedora: rpm -qa | grep getdata. Alternatively, search for libgetdata files: find /usr -name 'libgetdata*' 2>/dev/nullAffected if libgetdata library files are found on the system
-
Identify the installed libgetdata versionOn Debian: dpkg -s libgetdata0 or apt show libgetdata. On Fedora: rpm -qi getdata-libs. Or use: ldconfig -p | grep getdata to find the library and then check associated package infoAffected if The installed version matches 0.10.0 or falls within the affected ranges (Debian 9, Fedora 33-35)
-
Locate applications or services that link against libgetdataSearch for binaries that depend on libgetdata: ldd $(which <binary>) 2>/dev/null | grep getdata, or check application documentation for dirfile processing capabilities. Common tools include gdcat, gdhead, or custom applications using libgetdataAffected if Applications processing dirfile databases are in use
-
Identify if dirfile databases from untrusted sources are processedReview application logs, configuration, or code that handles .dirfile inputs. Check if user-supplied or network-received dirfile databases are processed without validation. Look for file inputs with .dat extension in dirfile formatAffected if The application processes dirfile databases, especially from external or untrusted sources
You are affected if libgetdata version 0.10.0 is installed and your system processes dirfile databases, particularly from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate libgetdata to the latest patched version. Until a patch is available, validate all dirfile database inputs before processing and run applications using libgetdata with least privilege to reduce impact of potential exploitation.
Upgrade to a version greater than 0.10.0 (e.g., 0.10.1 or latest stable release). For Debian, migrate to Debian 10/11 for full security support. For Fedora, apply all available updates.
- Identify the installed libgetdata version using: dpkg -l | grep getdata (Debian) or rpm -qa | grep getdata (Fedora)
- For Debian 9.0: Check for security updates via: apt-get update && apt-get upgrade libgetdata10 or upgrade to Debian 10/11 which contain patched versions
- For Fedora 33/34/35: Run: dnf update libgetdata to apply available security patches
- If using Getdata directly: Upgrade to the latest stable release (greater than 0.10.0) which contains the heap memory corruption fix
- Verify the fix by checking the version post-update: getdata-config --version
- Test any application that depends on libgetdata to ensure functionality is preserved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data