CVE-2021-20253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in ansible-tower. The default installation is vulnerable to Job Isolation escape allowing an attacker to elevate the privilege from a low privileged user to the awx user from outside the isolated environment. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAnsible Tower's default installation contains a Job Isolation escape vulnerability. Low-privileged users can escape the isolated containerized job execution environment and escalate privileges to the awx system user from outside the isolated environment, compromising the containment boundaries designed to protect the Tower host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.6.7>= 3.7.0, < 3.7.5>= 3.8.0, < 3.8.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Ansible Tower versionAccess the Tower UI as an admin and navigate to Settings > About, or use the API endpoint /api/v2/config/ to retrieve the version information. Alternatively, check the installation manifest or RPM package if you have CLI access.Affected if The version falls below 3.6.7, is between 3.7.0-3.7.4, or is between 3.8.0-3.8.1 (meaning it is one of the affected versions listed).
-
Confirm Job Isolation feature is enabledNavigate to Settings > Jobs in the Tower UI and locate the 'Job Isolation' setting. Check whether the isolation mechanism is turned on. In the API, query /api/v2/settings/jobs/ and look for the 'ISOLATION' or job isolation related parameters.Affected if Job Isolation is enabled and the Tower version is one of the vulnerable versions listed.
-
Verify containerized job execution settingsIn the Tower UI under Settings > Jobs, examine the 'Container Registry' and 'Job Execution' environment settings. Check if jobs are configured to run inside isolated containers. Review the /api/v2/settings/ jobs/ endpoint for isolation-related configuration keys.Affected if Containerized job execution is active and the version is within the affected range.
-
Review execution environment configurationCheck the defined Execution Environments in Tower under Resources > Execution Environments. Determine if the default execution environment is being used and whether it includes the isolation wrapper. Inspect the awx-manage dump_survey_passwords or related management commands if accessible.Affected if Default execution environments are in use and the Tower version is vulnerable.
You are affected if your installed Ansible Tower version matches one of the vulnerable ranges (below 3.6.7, 3.7.0-3.7.4, or 3.8.0-3.8.1) AND the Job Isolation feature is enabled for job execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.6.73.7.53.8.2
Review and properly configure Job Isolation settings in Ansible Tower/AWX to ensure proper containerization and sandboxing of job execution. Verify that the isolation mechanism correctly prevents escape to the host system.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data