CVE-2021-20479
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.0 through 2.3.3.3 Interim Fix 1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 197498.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Cloud Pak System versions 2.3.0 through 2.3.3.3 Interim Fix 1 implements weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms, potentially allowing attackers to decrypt highly sensitive information. The specific weak algorithms and attack vector are not detailed in the available description. The CVSS 7.5 score indicates high severity due to the potential exposure of sensitive data through cryptographic weakness.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.3.0.0, < 2.3.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Cloud Pak System is installedRun 'cloudctl' or 'ibmcloud cpk' command if available, or check for installation directories such as /opt/ibm or /opt/cloudpak. Check running processes for cloud pak system components.Affected if IBM Cloud Pak System is present in the environment
-
Determine the installed version of IBM Cloud Pak SystemUse the command 'cloudctl --version' or 'cloudctl cluster version', or inspect version files in the installation directory such as version.txt or manifest files in /opt/ibm/cloudpak/system. The version format follows 2.3.x.x.Affected if Version cannot be determined or is in the range >= 2.3.0.0 and < 2.3.3.4
-
Compare installed version against affected rangeDocument the exact version number found in step 2 and compare it mathematically: versions 2.3.0.0 through 2.3.3.3 (including Interim Fix 1) are affected. Version 2.3.3.4 and later are not affected.Affected if Installed version falls within >= 2.3.0.0.0 and < 2.3.3.4
-
Review cryptographic configuration if version is affectedExamine configuration files for cipher suites and cryptographic settings. Check /etc/ssl, application configuration files, and any PKI-related configurations for use of weak algorithms such as MD5, SHA1, or short key lengths.Affected if Weak cryptographic algorithms are found in configuration or the specific weak algorithms referenced in IBM security bulletins are in use
The environment is affected if IBM Cloud Pak System is installed with a version between 2.3.0.0 and 2.3.3.3 inclusive.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.3.3.4
Apply the latest IBM interim fix for Cloud Pak System that addresses the weak cryptographic algorithms, or upgrade to a patched version. Conduct a cryptographic audit to identify and replace any weak algorithms in use.
IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.4 or later
- Download IBM Cloud Pak System version 2.3.3.4 or later from IBM Fix Central or IBM Cloud Pak tickets
- Review IBM Cloud Pak System upgrade documentation for your specific deployment topology
- Ensure backup of current system configuration and data before initiating upgrade
- Follow IBM's standard upgrade procedure for Cloud Pak System 2.3.x series
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the cryptographic components are updated
- Confirm the new version is 2.3.3.4 or higher by checking system version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20479 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data