CVE-2021-20598
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOverly Restrictive Account Lockout Mechanism vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series CPU modules (R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to lockout a legitimate user by continuously trying login with incorrect password.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe MELSEC iQ-R series CPU modules have an overly restrictive account lockout mechanism that can be exploited by remote unauthenticated attackers. By repeatedly attempting logins with incorrect passwords, an attacker can trigger the lockout threshold and prevent legitimate users from accessing the device, causing a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the CPU module modelAccess the PLC programming software (GX Works3) or check the device nameplate documentation to determine the exact CPU model number (e.g., R08sfcpu, R16sfcpu, R32sfcpu, R120sfcpu, R08psfcpu, R16psfcpu, R32psfcpu, R120psfcpu)Affected if The model matches any of the eight affected product names listed in the CVE
-
Check the firmware versionIn GX Works3, navigate to the CPU module diagnostics or system information screen to view the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is any version (all versions of the affected models are vulnerable)
-
Verify network exposureCheck the PLC network configuration in GX Works3 under the Ethernet/CC-Link settings to determine if the Ethernet port is enabled and configured with an IP address accessible from external networksAffected if The device has an active Ethernet connection with a routable IP address accessible to unauthenticated network attackers
-
Confirm remote authentication is enabledCheck the CPU module security settings in GX Works3 under the Security -> User Authentication section to see if login authentication is configuredAffected if User authentication is enabled, meaning the account lockout mechanism can be triggered by repeated failed login attempts
-
Check account lockout configurationIn the CPU module security settings, review the account lockout threshold and lockout duration policy settingsAffected if A lockout threshold exists (even if set to a low number of attempts), confirming the vulnerable lockout mechanism is active
The environment is affected if any MELSEC iQ-R CPU module model listed (R08sfcpu, R16sfcpu, R32sfcpu, R120sfcpu, R08psfcpu, R16psfcpu, R32psfcpu, R120psfcpu) with any firmware version is accessible over the network with authentication enabled, as this allows remote attackers to trigger account lockout and cause denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate affected devices behind firewalls or in a protected network segment to limit exposure to unauthenticated attackers; implement rate-limiting or IP-based blocking at the network perimeter to detect and block brute-force authentication attempts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20598 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20598 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data