Clusterpro XApplication · Nec

CVE-2021-20700

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-11-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.3 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the Disk Agent CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier allows attacker to remote code execution via a network.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in the Disk Agent component of NEC's CLUSTERPRO X and EXPRESSCLUSTER X high-availability clustering software for Windows (versions 4.3 and earlier). The flaw is network-exploitable and allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication, likely due to insufficient bounds checking when processing network packets.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches/updates to upgrade to a version beyond 4.3, or implement network segmentation/restrict network access to the Disk Agent service if immediate patching is not feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Clusterpro XApplication
Affected:>= 1.0, <= 4.3
Clusterpro X SingleserversafeApplication
Affected:>= 1.0, <= 4.3
Expresscluster XApplication
Affected:>= 1.0, <= 4.3
Expresscluster X SingleserversafeApplication
Affected:>= 1.0, <= 4.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm NEC clustering software is installed
    Check for CLUSTERPRO X or EXPRESSCLUSTER X installation by looking in Program Files, Windows Services, or registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\NEC or similar. Look for service entries containing 'Clusterpro' or 'Expresscluster'.
    Affected if The software is found with any version between 1.0 and 4.3 inclusive.
  2. Identify installed version
    Use the product's built-in version information. Check the service properties in Windows Services, the program's About/Version info, or examine the main executable version resource (commonly located in the installation directory under bin or the main product folder).
    Affected if The version displayed is 4.3 or lower, or any version starting with 1.x through 4.x.
  3. Verify Disk Agent component status
    Check if the Disk Agent service or component is installed and running. This is typically exposed as a Windows service named 'Disk Agent' or part of the cluster configuration. Check the cluster management console or the service list for 'DiskAgent' or similar naming.
    Affected if The Disk Agent service is present and running, making the network-facing component active.
  4. Check network exposure of Disk Agent
    Identify the network port the Disk Agent listens on (commonly visible in cluster configuration or service properties). Use 'netstat -an' or Windows Firewall advanced security rules to see if the Disk Agent port is bound to a listening state and accessible from network interfaces.
    Affected if The Disk Agent is listening on a port accessible from network (not localhost-only or firewalled internally).

You are affected if NEC CLUSTERPRO X or EXPRESSCLUSTER X versions 1.0 through 4.3 are installed with the Disk Agent component enabled and network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.3
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches/updates to upgrade to a version beyond 4.3, or implement network segmentation/restrict network access to the Disk Agent service if immediate patching is not feasible.

Fix this in Clusterpro X Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20700 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20700 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data