CVE-2021-20860
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM LAN routers (WRC-1167GST2 firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-1167GST2A firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-1167GST2H firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-2533GS2-B firmware v1.52 and prior, WRC-2533GS2-W firmware v1.52 and prior, WRC-1750GS firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-1750GSV firmware v2.11 and prior, WRC-1900GST firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-2533GST firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-2533GSTA firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-2533GST2 firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-2533GST2SP firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-2533GST2-G firmware v1.25 and prior, and EDWRC-2533GST2 firmware v1.25 and prior) allows a remote authenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via a specially crafted page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple ELECOM LAN router models allows a remote authenticated attacker to hijack administrator authentication via a specially crafted page. The attack exploits the router's web interface lacking proper CSRF token validation, enabling malicious requests to be executed in the context of an authenticated administrator session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.25<= 1.25<= 1.25<= 1.52<= 1.52<= 1.03<= 2.11<= 1.03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelLocate the model name on the router's physical label or packaging, or check the web administration interface header for the model designation (e.g., Wrc 1167gst2, Wrc 2533gs2 B)Affected if The model is one of: Wrc 1167gst2, Wrc 1167gst2a, Wrc 1167gst2h, Wrc 2533gs2 B, Wrc 2533gs2 W, Wrc 1750gs, Wrc 1750gsv, or Wrc 1900gst
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the router's web administration interface and navigate to the System or Status page to view the firmware version, or use the CLI command 'show version' if SSH/Telnet access is availableAffected if The firmware version is at or below 1.25 for Wrc 1167gst2 variants, at or below 1.52 for Wrc 2533gs2 models, at or below 1.03 for Wrc 1750gs/Wrc 1900gst, or at or below 2.11 for Wrc 1750gsv
-
Verify the web management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the router's web interface by entering the router's IP address in a web browser; confirm the login page loadsAffected if The web administration interface is reachable on the local network (typically at http://192.168.0.1 or similar) and accepts administrator credentials
-
Confirm CSRF protection is absentInspect the router's login page HTML source or monitor HTTP requests during an authenticated session; look for CSRF tokens in forms or headers. The vulnerability exists if forms submit without requiring a unique token per requestAffected if The router's web interface processes configuration changes without requiring a unique, session-bound CSRF token in each request
You are affected if your router model matches one of the eight listed models AND your firmware version is at or below the specified limit AND the web management interface is accessible and lacks CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate router firmware to versions beyond those specified (v1.25, v1.52, or v1.03 depending on model). Until firmware is available, consider implementing additional network segmentation or using browser-based CSRF protections.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20860 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data