YappliApplication

CVE-2021-20873

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-12-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.30.0 or later.
See remediation →
88/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Yappli is an application development platform which provides the function to access a requested URL using Custom URL Scheme. When Android apps are developed with Yappli versions since v7.3.6 and prior to v9.30.0, they are vulnerable to improper authorization in Custom URL Scheme handler, and may be directed to unintended sites via a specially crafted URL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Yappli Android apps versions v7.3.6 through v9.30.0 contain improper authorization in the Custom URL Scheme handler. Specially crafted URLs using custom URL schemes can bypass intended validation and redirect users to attacker-controlled or unintended websites, enabling phishing or malware delivery.

MitigationUpdate Yappli platform to version 9.30.0 or later, then rebuild and redeploy all affected Android applications with the fixed platform version.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
YappliApplication
Affected:>= 7.3.6, < 9.30.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Yappli platform version in your Android app
    Inspect your Android project's build.gradle (or equivalent) file to find the Yappli SDK/platform dependency version. Look for a dependency like 'com.yappli:platform' or similar Yappli library with a version number.
    Affected if The listed version is 7.3.6 or higher but lower than 9.30.0
  2. Check if Custom URL Scheme handler is configured
    Examine your AndroidManifest.xml file for intent-filter definitions with custom URL schemes (such as yappli://, yourapp://, or other proprietary schemes). Look for <intent-filter> elements containing <data android:scheme="..."/>
    Affected if Custom URL scheme intent-filters are defined in the manifest
  3. Verify the APK uses the vulnerable Yappli version
    Decompile the deployed APK using apktool or similar tool, then search the resulting files for Yappli platform library version strings (often found in classes.dex, libraries, or configuration files).
    Affected if The bundled library version in the APK is 7.3.6 or higher but lower than 9.30.0 and the app handles URL schemes

Your environment is affected if your Android app embeds the Yappli platform library version 7.3.6 through 9.29.x and utilizes Custom URL Scheme handling for deep linking.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.30.0 or later
Fixed in 9.30.0
Interim mitigation

Update Yappli platform to version 9.30.0 or later, then rebuild and redeploy all affected Android applications with the fixed platform version.

Recommended fix High confidence

Yappli v9.30.0 or later

  1. Upgrade the Yappli SDK/library used in the Android application to version 9.30.0 or later
  2. After upgrading, rebuild and redeploy the Android application to ensure the fix is applied
  3. Verify that the Custom URL Scheme handler now properly validates authorization before redirecting

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Yappli Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-20873 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-20873 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data