CVE-2021-2102
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Dialog Box). Supported versions that are affected are 11.5.10, 12.1 and 12.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated remote vulnerability in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul's Dialog Box component allowing injection of malicious content via HTTP. The attack requires human interaction (likely social engineering to click a crafted link), enabling attackers to execute unauthorized operations with the privileges of the victim's session, including unauthorized data access (high confidentiality impact) and partial data modification (low integrity impact).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1= 12.2= 11.5.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Oracle CMRO versionQuery the Oracle Applications tables or use the Oracle Application Manager (OAM) to determine the exact version of Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul installed. Look for version strings 11.5.10, 12.1, or 12.2 in the Oracle E-Business Suite version information.Affected if The installed version matches 11.5.10, 12.1, or 12.2.
-
Verify Dialog Box component is HTTP-accessibleCheck the Oracle Applications context file (context_name.xml in $APPL_TOP/admin) or Oracle HTTP Server configuration to confirm the Dialog Box component is exposed via HTTP/HTTPS endpoints accessible from the network.Affected if The Dialog Box component is enabled and reachable over HTTP without additional authentication layers.
-
Review Oracle Fusion Middleware proxy configurationInspect the Oracle WebLogic Server or Oracle HTTP Server configuration files (such as mod_wl_ohs.conf or httpd.conf) for any URL forwarding rules that expose the Dialog Box functionality to unauthenticated users.Affected if URL routing rules allow unauthenticated access to Dialog Box endpoints.
-
Examine Oracle Applications listener security settingsCheck the Oracle Forms and Apache configuration files (specifically the forms.conf or app.conf) to determine if the Forms servlet that serves Dialog Box content has proper authentication enforcement.Affected if The Forms servlet or Dialog Box component lacks强制 authentication or uses weak access controls.
-
Audit access logs for suspicious Dialog Box requestsReview Oracle HTTP Server access logs (in $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/logs or equivalent) for anomalous GET/POST requests to Dialog Box-related URLs, particularly those containing unexpected parameters or encoded content.Affected if Logs show unauthorized or unexpected requests to Dialog Box endpoints from untrusted sources.
Your environment is affected if you run Oracle CMRO versions 11.5.10, 12.1, or 12.2 with the Dialog Box component exposed over HTTP to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) containing the fix for CVE-2021-2102 to affected versions 11.5.10, 12.1, and 12.2. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the affected Oracle application to trusted networks only, and educate users about not clicking untrusted links.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-2102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-2102 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data