Cla AssistantApplication · Sap

CVE-2021-21471

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-01-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.8.5 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In CLA-Assistant, versions before 2.8.5, due to improper access control an authenticated user could access API endpoints which are not intended to be used by the user. This could impact the integrity of the application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CLA-Assistant versions before 2.8.5 contains improper access control that allows authenticated users to access API endpoints that should be restricted to other user roles or administrative users. This broken access control vulnerability could allow users to perform actions or view data outside their intended permissions, potentially impacting data integrity.

MitigationUpgrade to CLA-Assistant version 2.8.5 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, review API endpoint authorization logic and implement role-based access control (RBAC) checks on all sensitive endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cla AssistantApplication
Affected:< 2.8.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CLA-Assistant installation and version
    Locate the CLA-Assistant application installation directory and check the version metadata file (such as package.json, VERSION file, or application settings). If running as a service, check the deployed application version through the admin interface or startup logs.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.8.5 (for example, 2.8.4, 2.8.0, or earlier releases).
  2. Verify API endpoint accessibility
    Using an authenticated non-administrator user account, attempt to access API endpoints that should be restricted to administrative roles (such as user management, configuration修改, or sensitive data retrieval endpoints). Use a tool like curl or Postman to send requests with the non-admin user credentials.
    Affected if The API endpoints return data or allow actions that should be restricted to administrators, indicating broken access control.
  3. Inspect API authorization configuration
    Review the application's source code or configuration files for the API routing layer. Check each endpoint's authorization logic to verify that role-based access control (RBAC) checks are properly enforced before allowing access to sensitive operations.
    Affected if API endpoints lack proper role verification checks, or allow authenticated users to bypass authorization restrictions.
  4. Review user role assignment logic
    Examine the application's authentication and authorization middleware to confirm that user roles are correctly assigned and enforced. Verify that the system properly distinguishes between regular users and administrative users when processing API requests.
    Affected if The system does not correctly enforce role-based restrictions, allowing lower-privileged users to access higher-privilege functions.

A user is affected if CLA-Assistant version is below 2.8.5 AND the application exposes API endpoints that lack proper role-based access control checks, allowing unauthorized role escalation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.8.5 or later
Fixed in 2.8.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to CLA-Assistant version 2.8.5 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, review API endpoint authorization logic and implement role-based access control (RBAC) checks on all sensitive endpoints.

Fix this in Cla Assistant Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-21471 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-21471 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data