CVE-2021-21683
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe file browser in Jenkins 2.314 and earlier, LTS 2.303.1 and earlier may interpret some paths to files as absolute on Windows, resulting in a path traversal vulnerability allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission (Windows controller) or Job/Workspace permission (Windows agents) to obtain the contents of arbitrary files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins file browser in versions 2.314 and earlier (LTS 2.303.1 and earlier) contains a path traversal vulnerability on Windows systems where certain paths are incorrectly interpreted as absolute paths, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission on Windows controllers or Job/Workspace permission on Windows agents to read arbitrary files on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.303.1<= 2.314CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Jenkins versionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins or run 'java -jar jenkins.war --version' from the Jenkins installation directory. The version is displayed on the main page footer in the web UI.Affected if Version is 2.314 or earlier, or LTS 2.303.1 or earlier
-
Confirm Windows operating systemCheck the operating system where Jenkins controller or agent is running. Run 'systeminfo' on Windows or check system properties. The vulnerability only affects Windows systems.Affected if The Jenkins controller or the agent with accessible workspace runs on Windows
-
Verify file browser access permissionsCheck if users have Overall/Read permission (for controller file browser) or Job/Configure permission on jobs with workspace access (for agent file browser). Review user permissions in Manage Jenkins > Manage Users and check job configurations.Affected if Users with Overall/Read or Job/Workspace permissions exist in the system
-
Check if file browser feature is accessibleAttempt to access the file browser: for controller, go to Manage Jenkins > Browse Files. For agent workspaces, navigate to a job > Workspace > Workspace browser link. Alternatively, check if any jobs have workspace directories configured.Affected if File browser functionality is accessible to non-admin users with read permissions
A user is affected if running Jenkins version 2.314 or earlier (or LTS 2.303.1 or earlier) on Windows, with users having Overall/Read or Job/Workspace permissions, and the file browser feature is accessible to them.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Jenkins to a version newer than 2.314 (or LTS newer than 2.303.1). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict file browser access and monitor for suspicious path traversal attempts in file browser requests.
Jenkins 2.315 (weekly) or Jenkins LTS 2.303.2
- Identify the current Jenkins version running in your environment
- Determine if you are using a weekly release or LTS release
- For weekly releases: Upgrade from Jenkins 2.314 or earlier to Jenkins 2.315 or later
- For LTS releases: Upgrade from Jenkins 2.303.1 or earlier to Jenkins 2.303.2 or later LTS
- Download the new Jenkins WAR file or use your package manager to perform the upgrade
- Restart Jenkins service to apply the changes
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Jenkins version in the UI (Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins)
- Test that the file browser functionality works correctly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-21683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-21683 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data