JenkinsApplication

CVE-2021-21687

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-11-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.303.3 / 2.319 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins 2.318 and earlier, LTS 2.303.2 and earlier does not check agent-to-controller access to create symbolic links when unarchiving a symbolic link in FilePath#untar.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Jenkins versions 2.318 and earlier, LTS 2.303.2 and earlier fail to validate agent-to-controller access permissions when unarchiving symbolic links via the FilePath#untar method. This allows compromised or malicious agents to create arbitrary symbolic links on the Jenkins controller file system, potentially enabling path traversal, privilege escalation, or remote code execution.

MitigationUpgrade Jenkins to version 2.319+ (LTS 2.303.3+) which includes the proper permission check for agent-to-controller access during symbolic link creation in unarchiving operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JenkinsApplication
Affected:< 2.303.3< 2.319

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Jenkins version
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins, or check the version displayed on the login page, or run: java -jar jenkins.war --version
    Affected if The version shown is earlier than 2.303.3 for LTS or earlier than 2.319 for weekly releases
  2. Confirm if Jenkins agents are configured
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Nodes. Check if any permanent or temporary agents are defined and connected.
    Affected if Agents are defined and connected, creating the attack surface for this vulnerability
  3. Verify if the FilePath#untar functionality is accessible
    Review Jenkins job configurations or scripts that use the 'untar' operation, particularly those running on agents that could supply malicious archive content.
    Affected if Any jobs or pipelines use the untar or similar archive extraction operations on agent nodes
  4. Inspect for unexpected symbolic links on the controller
    Run 'find / -type l -ls' (Linux) or 'Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Link | Format-Table FullName, Target' (Windows) to list all symbolic links on the Jenkins controller filesystem.
    Affected if Symbolic links exist in directories outside of expected locations such as agent workspaces or known archive extraction directories

A user is affected if their Jenkins version is earlier than 2.303.3 (LTS) or 2.319 (weekly) AND they have agents configured with access to the untar functionality.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.303.3 / 2.319 or later
Fixed in 2.303.32.319
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jenkins to version 2.319+ (LTS 2.303.3+) which includes the proper permission check for agent-to-controller access during symbolic link creation in unarchiving operations.

Recommended fix High confidence

Jenkins 2.319 (weekly) or Jenkins LTS 2.303.3

  1. 1. Backup your Jenkins home directory and any critical data
  2. 2. Review the Jenkins 2.319 and LTS 2.303.3 release notes for any relevant changes
  3. 3. Stop the Jenkins service
  4. 4. Upgrade Jenkins to version 2.319 or later (weekly) / LTS 2.303.3 or later
  5. 5. Start the Jenkins service
  6. 6. Verify the controller can no longer be affected by unauthorized agent symlink creation
Caveat Review release notes for breaking changes between your current version and 2.319/2.303.3

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jenkins Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-21687 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-21687 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data