CVE-2021-22284
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in OPC Server for AC 800M allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the node running the AC800M OPC Server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn incorrect permission assignment vulnerability in the OPC Server for AC 800M allows unauthorized users or processes to modify critical system resources such as executable files, configuration files, or DLLs. This permission misconfiguration enables an attacker to inject or replace code that the OPC Server will execute, leading to arbitrary code execution on the node.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1.0-0, < 6.0.0-4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OPC Server for AC 800M is installedCheck for the product in Windows Programs and Features, or search for installation directories like C:\Program Files\ABB\OPC Server for AC 800M or C:\ABB\OPC Server for AC 800MAffected if Product is installed with version >= 5.1.0-0 and < 6.0.0-4
-
Check installed version numberRight-click on the installed ABB OPC Server for AC 800M entry in Programs and Features and select Properties, or check the version info of the main executable (e.g., Ac800MConnect.exe or OPCServerAC800M.exe) in the installation folderAffected if Version displayed is between 5.1.0-0 and 6.0.0-4 (exclusive)
-
Inspect installation directory permissionsRight-click the installation folder, select Properties, go to the Security tab, and review the permissions for Users, Everyone, and other groupsAffected if Users group or Everyone has Write or Modify permissions on the installation directory
-
Check executable file permissionsRight-click each executable file in the installation folder (e.g., .exe and .dll files), open Properties, Security tab, and verify write permissions are not granted to unauthorized accountsAffected if Any user account or group other than Administrators has Write permission on executable or DLL files
-
Review configuration file permissionsExamine permissions on configuration files (e.g., .ini, .xml, .cfg files) in the installation directory - right-click each, check Security tabAffected if Configuration files are writable by Users, Everyone, or other non-admin groups
If the product version is 5.1.0-0 through 6.0.0-3 AND the installation directory, executables, or config files have Write/Modify permissions granted to non-administrator users or groups, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.0.0-4
Restrict file system permissions on the OPC Server for AC 800M installation directory, binaries, and configuration files to only authorized administrators/service accounts, removing any world-writable or group-writable permissions that allow unauthorized code injection or modification.
Upgrade to OPC Server for AC 800M version 6.0.0-4 or later
- Confirm the current installed version of OPC Server for AC 800M
- Review the 800M Engineer's documentation for upgrade procedures and prerequisites
- Create a full backup of the current configuration and project files
- Stop all OPC Server services and related processes
- Upgrade OPC Server for AC 800M to version 6.0.0-4 or later
- Verify the installation was successful and services start correctly
- Validate that existing projects and configurations load properly
- Confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22284 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data