CVE-2021-22299
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in some Huawei products. A local, authenticated attacker could craft specific commands to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the attacker to obtain a higher privilege. Affected product versions include: ManageOne versions 6.5.0,6.5.0.SPC100.B210,6.5.1.1.B010,6.5.1.1.B020,6.5.1.1.B030,6.5.1.1.B040,6.5.1.SPC100.B050,6.5.1.SPC101.B010,6.5.1.SPC101.B040,6.5.1.SPC200,6.5.1.SPC200.B010,6.5.1.SPC200.B030,6.5.1.SPC200.B040,6.5.1.SPC200.B050,6.5.1.SPC200.B060,6.5.1.SPC200.B070,6.5.1RC1.B060,6.5.1RC2.B020,6.5.1RC2.B030,6.5.1RC2.B040,6.5.1RC2.B050,6.5.1RC2.B060,6.5.1RC2.B070,6.5.1RC2.B080,6.5.1RC2.B090,6.5.RC2.B050,8.0.0,8.0.0-LCND81,8.0.0.SPC100,8.0.1,8.0.RC2,8.0.RC3,8.0.RC3.B041,8.0.RC3.SPC100; NFV_FusionSphere versions 6.5.1.SPC23,8.0.0.SPC12; SMC2.0 versions V600R019C00,V600R019C10; iMaster MAE-M versions MAE-TOOL(FusionSphereBasicTemplate_Euler_X86)V100R020C10SPC220.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Huawei products (ManageOne, NFV_FusionSphere, SMC2.0, iMaster MAE-M) where an authenticated attacker can craft specific commands to gain higher privileges. The vulnerability is locally exploitable and requires prior authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v100r020c10spc220= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.1.1= 8.0.0= 8.0.1= 6.5.1= v600r019c00= v600r019c10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Huawei productDetermine which Huawei product is running in your environment (iMaster MAE-M, ManageOne, NFV_FusionSphere, or SMC2.0). Check the system documentation or inventory for the product name.Affected if The product is one of iMaster MAE-M, ManageOne, NFV_FusionSphere, or SMC2.0
-
Check the installed versionUse the product-specific command or management interface to retrieve the installed version number. Compare it against the affected versions: iMaster MAE-M v100r020c10spc220; ManageOne 6.5.0, 6.5.1, 6.5.1.1, 8.0.0, 8.0.1; NFV_FusionSphere 6.5.1; SMC2.0 v600r019c00, v600r019c10.Affected if The installed version matches exactly one of the affected versions listed
-
Verify authentication access controlsReview user accounts and authentication methods that have access to the affected product's management interface or command line. Since this vulnerability requires prior authentication, identify which users or groups can log in.Affected if Untrusted or low-privilege users have authentication access to the affected product
-
Audit for privilege escalation indicatorsReview system logs, audit logs, and command history for signs of privilege escalation attempts or unexpected command execution that could indicate exploitation of this vulnerability.Affected if Logs show commands executed with elevated privileges by a previously low-privilege authenticated user
You are affected if you are running one of the listed product versions AND untrusted or low-privilege users have authentication access to the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches or updates to the affected Huawei product versions. Since this is a local privilege escalation, ensure strict access controls and monitor for suspicious command execution.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22299 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22299 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data