ManageoneApplication · Huawei

CVE-2021-22311

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-03-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is an improper permission assignment vulnerability in Huawei ManageOne product. Due to improper security hardening, the process can run with a higher privilege. Successful exploit could allow certain users to do certain operations with improper permissions. Affected product versions include: ManageOne versions 8.0.0, 8.0.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper permission assignment vulnerability in Huawei ManageOne where due to inadequate security hardening, certain processes run with elevated privileges. This allows authenticated users to perform operations beyond their intended permission level through the improperly privileged process.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied security patches for ManageOne 8.0.0/8.0.1 and review process privilege configurations to ensure adherence to principle of least privilege.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ManageoneApplication
Affected:= 8.0.0= 8.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ManageOne installation version
    Access the ManageOne administration console or check the installation directory for version information. Typically found in /opt/ManageOne/version or through the management interface under 'System Information' or 'About'.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 8.0.0 or exactly 8.0.1
  2. Review process privilege configurations
    Examine running ManageOne service processes using system commands such as 'ps aux' or 'tasklist' to identify processes running with elevated or root-level privileges. Compare against documented expected privilege levels for each service.
    Affected if Any ManageOne service process runs with privileges exceeding what is required for its documented function, or runs as root/superuser when not documented as necessary
  3. Verify user role permission assignments
    Access the ManageOne user management or RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) configuration panel. Review role definitions and verify that authenticated users can only access operations matching their assigned roles.
    Affected if Users with standard or limited roles can perform administrative or elevated operations through certain service processes
  4. Audit process-to-user mapping
    Check the service account configurations and process ownership for ManageOne components. Look for services executing under privileged accounts (such as root, administrator, or svc_admin) versus dedicated service accounts with limited permissions.
    Affected if ManageOne services execute under high-privilege accounts when lower-privilege accounts could be used

A user is affected if their ManageOne installation is version 8.0.0 or 8.0.1 AND certain processes run with elevated privileges beyond what the principle of least privilege would require.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied security patches for ManageOne 8.0.0/8.0.1 and review process privilege configurations to ensure adherence to principle of least privilege.

Fix this in Manageone Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22311 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22311 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data