CVE-2021-22312
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere is a memory leak vulnerability in some Huawei products. An authenticated remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending specific message to the affected product. Due to not release the allocated memory properly, successful exploit may cause some service abnormal. Affected product include some versions of IPS Module, NGFW Module, Secospace USG6300, Secospace USG6500, Secospace USG6600 and USG9500.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory leak vulnerability in Huawei security products (USG6300, USG6500, USG6600, USG9500, IPS Module, NGFW Module) where an authenticated remote attacker can send specific messages causing allocated memory to not be properly released, leading to service abnormalities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100= v500r005c00spc200CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product modelAccess the device console or admin web interface and locate the system information or device model display to confirm the exact model (USG6300, USG6500, USG6600, USG9500, IPS Module, NGFW Module, Nip6300, or Nip6600).Affected if Model is not one of these eight product lines, the device is not affected by this specific CVE.
-
Check firmware versionIn the device admin interface, go to System > About or use the 'display version' command in the console to retrieve the installed firmware version string.Affected if Version matches v500r005c00spc100, v500r005c00spc200, v500r001c30spc200, v500r001c30spc600, or v500r001c60spc500.
-
Verify remote management is accessibleCheck if the web-based admin interface, SSL VPN, or remote management service is exposed to network access. Review firewall rules or interface bindings to determine if external IP addresses can reach the management interface.Affected if Remote management is enabled and reachable from untrusted networks; an attacker would need to send specifically crafted messages to trigger the memory leak.
-
Monitor for memory exhaustionUse the 'display memory-usage' or 'display cpu-usage' command, or check the device health dashboard for abnormally high memory consumption that persists or grows over time.Affected if Memory usage is unusually high or continuously increasing without returning to baseline, which may indicate the leak is occurring.
The device is affected if it is one of the eight product models listed and runs any of the five specific firmware versions listed, with remote management exposed to allow an authenticated attacker to send the triggering messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches/updates for affected Huawei products when available. Monitor system resources and service health for signs of memory exhaustion indicating active exploitation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22312 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22312 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data