HarmonyosOperating system · Huawei

CVE-2021-22425

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A component of the HarmonyOS has a Double Free vulnerability. Local attackers may exploit this vulnerability to cause Root Elevating Privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A double free vulnerability exists in a component of Huawei's HarmonyOS operating system. This memory corruption bug allows a local attacker to trigger the improper freeing of memory twice, which can lead to heap corruption and ultimately enable root privilege escalation on the affected device.

MitigationApply the vendor-provided security patch for HarmonyOS as soon as possible. Since this is a local privilege escalation vulnerability, prioritize patching devices with privileged user access or exposed attack surfaces.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HarmonyosOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm the device is running Huawei HarmonyOS
    Check the operating system information on the device. On HarmonyOS, you can typically verify this via system settings under 'About Phone' or by running 'getprop ro.build.version.emui' or checking /etc/version note that HarmonyOS may show different identifiers.
    Affected if The device is confirmed to be running any version of Huawei HarmonyOS as the operating system.
  2. Identify the specific HarmonyOS version
    Navigate to Settings > About Phone on the device, or use the command line to query the system version. Record the exact version number or build number displayed.
    Affected if The device is running any version of HarmonyOS, as the advisory states all versions are affected.
  3. Determine if the vulnerable component is present
    Since the specific affected component is not publicly detailed in the CVE, identify any proprietary Huawei/HarmonyOS components or services running on the device. Check running processes or system services that handle memory management, privileged operations, or inter-process communication.
    Affected if The vulnerable component exists and is active on the device. Because all HarmonyOS versions are listed as affected, assume the component is present if HarmonyOS is confirmed.
  4. Check for signs of heap corruption
    Review system logs (typically found in /data/log or /var/log) for crash reports, memory corruption indicators, or double-free related error messages. Use tools like 'dmesg' or logcat if available to search for terms like 'double free', 'heap corruption', or 'memory corruption'.
    Affected if System logs or crash dumps show evidence of heap corruption, double-free errors, or memory management failures occurring in a HarmonyOS component.

If the device runs Huawei HarmonyOS in any version, it is affected by this vulnerability and should be prioritized for patching given its local privilege escalation impact.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-provided security patch for HarmonyOS as soon as possible. Since this is a local privilege escalation vulnerability, prioritize patching devices with privileged user access or exposed attack surfaces.

Fix this in Harmonyos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22425 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22425 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data