CVE-2021-22511
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Automation Tools Plugin - Jenkins plugin. The vulnerability affects version 6.7 and earlier versions. The vulnerability could allow unconditionally disabling of SSL/TLS certificates.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Automation Tools Jenkins plugin (versions 6.7 and earlier) allows unconditionally disabling SSL/TLS certificate validation. This means SSL/TLS certificate verification can be bypassed, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks and compromising encrypted communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Micro Focus Application Automation Tools plugin is installedIn Jenkins, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and look for 'Micro Focus Application Automation Tools' in the list. Alternatively, check the JENKINS_HOME/plugins directory for the plugin folder.Affected if The plugin is present in the Jenkins instance
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn Jenkins plugin manager, find the Micro Focus Application Automation Tools plugin and note the version number displayed. Compare this version against the affected range: version 6.7 or earlier.Affected if The installed version is 6.7 or earlier
-
Inspect plugin configuration for SSL/TLS validation settingsLook for plugin-specific configuration under Manage Jenkins > Configure System or within job configurations where the plugin is used. Search for settings related to SSL, TLS, certificate validation, or secure connections.Affected if A configuration option exists and is set to disable or bypass SSL/TLS certificate validation
-
Review global security settingsCheck Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security for any security settings that may interact with the plugin's SSL/TLS behavior.Affected if SSL/TLS certificate validation is globally disabled or set to trust all certificates
The environment is affected if the Micro Focus Application Automation Tools plugin version 6.7 or earlier is installed AND SSL/TLS certificate validation is configured to be disabled or bypassed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of the Micro Focus Application Automation Tools plugin for Jenkins. If no patched version is available, evaluate removing or replacing the plugin with a secure alternative and audit any connections that previously relied on the plugin.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22511 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22511 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data