CVE-2021-22679
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe affected product is vulnerable to an integer overflow while processing HTTP headers, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute code on the SimpleLink Wi-Fi (MSP432E4 SDK: v4.20.00.12 and prior, CC32XX SDK v4.30.00.06 and prior, CC13X0 SDK versions prior to v4.10.03, CC13X2 and CC26XX SDK versions prior to v4.40.00, CC3200 SDK v1.5.0 and prior, CC3100 SDK v1.3.0 and prior).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in HTTP header processing within SimpleLink Wi-Fi firmware across multiple SDK versions (MSP432E4, CC32XX, CC13X0, CC13X2/CC26XX, CC3200, CC3100). The overflow can corrupt memory and enable remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.3.0<= 1.5.0< 4.10.03< 4.40.00< 4.40.00<= 4.30.00.06<= 4.20.00.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the TI SimpleLink SDK or device in useDetermine which product family applies: CC3100, CC3200, CC13X0, CC13X2, CC26XX, CC32XX, or MSP432E4. Check project files, build configuration, or device documentation.Affected if The device or SDK is one of the seven product families listed in the affected versions.
-
Locate the SDK version informationFor development environments, check the SDK installation directory name or version file. For deployed devices, check the firmware version string via UART debug, HTTP server info page, or device management interface.Affected if The SDK or firmware version cannot be determined or is not visible through standard interfaces.
-
Compare the installed version against affected rangesMatch your identified SDK version to the affected ranges: CC3100 SDK <= 1.3.0, CC3200 SDK <= 1.5.0, CC13X0 SDK < 4.10.03, CC13X2 SDK < 4.40.00, CC26XX SDK < 4.40.00, CC32XX SDK <= 4.30.00.06, MSP432E4 SDK <= 4.20.00.12Affected if Your SDK version falls within or below any of these thresholds.
-
Confirm HTTP server functionality is in useVerify that the device firmware includes HTTP server capability. Check if CONFIG_WLAN_STATION or similar Wi-Fi services are enabled, and if HTTP server modules are included in the build.Affected if HTTP server or Wi-Fi web server functionality is compiled into the firmware.
You are affected if your device runs firmware built with an SDK version that falls within or below the affected ranges AND the HTTP server feature is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.10.034.40.00
Update to patched SDK versions: MSP432E4 SDK v4.20.00.13+, CC32XX SDK v4.30.00.07+, CC13X0 SDK v4.10.03+, CC13X2/CC26XX SDK v4.40.00+, CC3200 SDK v1.5.1+, CC3100 SDK v1.3.1+.
Upgrade to at least CC13x0 SDK v4.10.03, CC13x2/CC26xx SDK v4.40.00, CC32xx SDK v4.40.00, MSP432E4 SDK v4.30.00 (or later), CC3100 SDK v1.4.0 (or later), CC3200 SDK v1.6.0 (or later)
- Identify the exact SimpleLink SDK version used in your product (check the SDK release notes or version file).
- Determine if the version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges: CC3100 SDK <= 1.3.0, CC3200 SDK <= 1.5.0, CC13x0 SDK < 4.10.03, CC13x2/CC26xx SDK < 4.40.00, CC32xx SDK <= 4.30.00.06, MSP432E4 SDK <= 4.20.00.12.
- Download the latest SimpleLink SDK for your device from the Texas Instruments website (e.g., SimpleLink CC13x0 SDK, CC13x2 SDK, CC26xx SDK, CC32xx SDK, MSP432E4 SDK, CC3100 SDK, CC3200 SDK).
- Upgrade the SDK to at least the following secure versions: CC13x0 SDK v4.10.03 or later; CC13x2/CC26xx SDK v4.40.00 or later; CC32xx SDK v4.40.00 or later; MSP432E4 SDK v4.30.00 (or later); CC3100 SDK v1.4.0 or later; CC3200 SDK v1.6.0 or later (or the most recent version available).
- Rebuild the firmware/application with the new SDK, ensuring all compiler flags and dependencies remain consistent.
- Perform regression testing, especially around HTTP header processing, to verify the vulnerability is resolved and no new issues are introduced.
- Deploy the updated firmware to devices.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA5.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,216.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22679 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22679 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data