CVE-2021-22714
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA CWE-119:Improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer vulnerability exists in PowerLogic ION7400, PM8000 and ION9000 (All versions prior to V3.0.0), which could cause the meter to reboot or allow for remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CWE-119 memory buffer vulnerability exists in PowerLogic ION7400, PM8000, and ION9000 power meter firmware versions prior to V3.0.0. The improper restriction of memory operations can lead to buffer overflow, enabling either denial of service (device reboot) or remote code execution on the affected meter devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.0.0< 3.0.0< 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the power meter modelAccess the device web interface, serial console, or management software (such as PowerLogic ION Setup) and locate the device model information. Confirm the device is one of: ION7400, PM8000, or ION9000.Affected if The device model is NOT ION7400, PM8000, or ION9000 (different models are not affected by this CVE).
-
Retrieve the installed firmware versionIn the device web interface, go to the firmware or system information page. Alternatively, use the device console or management software to query the firmware version. Look for a version field labeled as Vx.x.x or firmware version.Affected if Unable to determine the firmware version from the device interface or management tools.
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangeNote the installed firmware version (for example: V2.5.0, V2.8.1, V2.9.5). Compare it numerically to version 3.0.0. Any version with a major number less than 3, or major version 3 with minor version 0 and patch 0, is prior to V3.0.0.Affected if The installed firmware version is less than V3.0.0 (for example: V2.9.5, V2.8.0, V2.5.2). This means the device is running a vulnerable version.
-
Verify if network exposure existsReview network configuration to determine if the meter is accessible from untrusted networks (DMZ, internet-facing segments, or directly connected to enterprise networks without firewall protection). Check if the device management interface (web UI, ports 80/443) is exposed externally.Affected if The vulnerable meter is directly accessible from untrusted networks, increasing the exploit risk for remote code execution.
The device is affected if it is an ION7400, PM8000, or ION9000 power meter running firmware version prior to V3.0.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.0.0
Upgrade PowerLogic ION7400, PM8000, and ION9000 firmware to version V3.0.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Given the critical CVSS score and RCE potential, prioritize patching of externally-accessible meters.
PowerLogic ION7400/PM8000/ION9000 firmware version 3.0.0
- 1. Identify the specific PowerLogic meter model (ION7400, PM8000, or ION9000) in your environment
- 2. Check the current firmware version on the device through its web interface or management console
- 3. Navigate to the official Schneider Electric download portal (www.se.com) and locate the firmware section for your specific meter model
- 4. Download firmware version 3.0.0 or later for your device model
- 5. Review Schneider Electric's official firmware upgrade documentation for the specific device before proceeding
- 6. Apply the firmware upgrade following Schneider Electric's recommended procedure for the device
- 7. After upgrade, verify the firmware version shows 3.0.0 or later and confirm device is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22714 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22714 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data