CVE-2021-22816
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists that could cause a Denial of Service of the RTU when receiving a specially crafted request over Modbus, and the RTU is configured as a Modbus server. Affected Products: SCADAPack 312E, 313E, 314E, 330E, 333E, 334E, 337E, 350E and 357E RTUs with firmware V8.18.1 and prior
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA CWE-754 Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists in SCADAPack RTU devices (312E through 357E) where a specially crafted Modbus request can cause denial of service when the RTU is configured as a Modbus server. The vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger an unhandled exceptional condition leading to service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.19.1< 8.19.1< 8.19.1< 8.19.1< 8.19.1< 8.19.1< 8.19.1< 8.19.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SCADAPack modelQuery the device via its web interface, console, or Modbus register 0-9999 (device identification) to confirm the exact model number (312e, 313e, 314e, 330e, 333e, 334e, 337e, or 350e)Affected if The device is a Schneider Electric SCADAPack 312e, 313e, 314e, 330e, 333e, 334e, 337e, or 350e
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface, console, or read Modbus register 0-1000 (firmware revision) to obtain the exact firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version is below 8.19.1 (for example, 8.18.0, 8.17.x, or earlier)
-
Verify Modbus server is enabledCheck the device configuration via its web interface or console under Modbus settings to confirm if the Modbus server (slave) functionality is turned onAffected if The Modbus server role is enabled and the device is configured to respond to Modbus requests
-
Confirm network accessibility of Modbus serviceUse a network scan or port check (for example, telnet or nmap) to verify that the Modbus port (default 502) is open and reachable from the networkAffected if The Modbus server port is accessible from network segments that contain untrusted or unknown clients
You are affected if you have a SCADAPack 312e-350e device running firmware below version 8.19.1 with the Modbus server feature enabled and accessible from the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.19.1
Update firmware to a version beyond V8.18.1. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation and restrict access to Modbus server ports to trusted clients only.
Firmware 8.19.1 or later
- Verify the exact model and current firmware version of the Scadapack RTU device before upgrading
- Download the firmware version 8.19.1 or later from the Schneider Electric download portal (download.schneider-electric.com)
- Review the firmware release notes for any special installation instructions or prerequisites
- Backup the current device configuration if possible
- Follow Schneider Electric's standard firmware update procedure for Scadapack RTU devices, typically involving transferring the firmware file via the device's management interface
- After upgrading, verify the firmware version has been updated successfully
- Test that the Modbus server functionality operates normally after the upgrade
- Confirm the vulnerability is mitigated by ensuring the device no longer crashes from specially crafted Modbus requests
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22816 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data