CVE-2021-22936
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 could allow a threat actor to perform a cross-site script attack against an authenticated administrator via an unsanitized web parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure versions prior to 9.1R12. The flaw allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code through an unsanitized web parameter, which then executes in the context of an administrator's session when viewed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.1< 9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed product and versionAccess the admin web interface and check the system information page, or run 'dpkg -l' / 'rpm -qa' on the server to list installed packages containing 'pulse' or 'ivanti' in the name.Affected if The product is Pulse Connect Secure with version less than 9.1R12, or Ivanti Connect Secure version 9.1.
-
Confirm the web administrative interface is enabledVerify that the admin web UI (typically on port 443 or 9443) is accessible and running. Check if /admin or /dana-na/auth/ endpoints respond.Affected if The administrative web interface is exposed and accessible to authenticated users.
-
Determine if the system has user authentication enabledReview the authentication settings in the admin console under 'Authentication > Authentication Servers' to confirm local or external users can authenticate.Affected if Remote authenticated attacker can access the system, as the vulnerability requires an authenticated session.
-
Check for evidence of the vulnerable parameter handlingReview web server logs (typically in /var/log/ or through the admin interface logs) for unsanitized web parameter submissions, particularly in admin-facing pages.Affected if Logs show unauthenticated or low-privilege user input being reflected without sanitization in admin-accessible areas.
If the installed version is Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 or Ivanti Connect Secure 9.1, and the admin web interface is accessible to authenticated users, the environment is likely affected by this stored XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.1
Upgrade Pulse Connect Secure to version 9.1R12 or later to obtain the patch. Additionally, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers and validate/sanitize all user inputs as defense-in-depth measures.
9.1R12 or later stable release
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Pulse Connect Secure or Connect Secure by checking the system admin interface or running the appropriate version command
- 2. Navigate to the Pulse Secure knowledge base (kb.pulsesecure.net) and locate the download page for Pulse Connect Secure version 9.1R12 or later
- 3. Review the release notes for version 9.1R12 to understand any prerequisites, migration considerations, or pre-upgrade requirements
- 4. Create a full system backup and snapshot of the current configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades typically require brief system downtime
- 6. Download the 9.1R12 (or latest stable) installer from the Pulse Secure support portal
- 7. Follow the standard Pulse Connect Secure upgrade procedure documented in the admin guide - usually involves uploading the installer through the admin web interface or CLI
- 8. After upgrade completes, verify the system is operational and the new version is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22936 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22936 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data