CVE-2021-22958
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in concrete5 < 8.5.5 that allowed a decimal notation encoded IP address to bypass the limitations in place for localhost allowing interaction with local services. Impact can vary depending on services exposed.CVSSv2.0 AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in concrete5 versions before 8.5.5 allows attackers to bypass localhost restrictions by using decimal notation encoded IP addresses (e.g., 127.0.0.1 converts to 2130706433), enabling interaction with internal services that should be protected by network restrictions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.5.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the installed concrete5 versionLog in to the concrete5 dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System & Settings > About, or check the version.php file in the /application/config/ or /concrete/ directoryAffected if The installed version is any release before 8.5.5 (e.g., 8.5.4, 8.5.3, earlier versions)
-
Identify if external URL requests are acceptedLocate any forms, API endpoints, or features in the concrete5 site that accept URL input from users, such as file import from URL, webhooks, or content scraping featuresAffected if The site has functionality that allows users to submit or specify URLs that the server will fetch or request
-
Test decimal IP address handlingIf URL input functionality exists, submit a request using decimal IP notation (e.g., http://2130706433/ or http://3232235777/) instead of localhost or 127.0.0.1 to see if the application accepts itAffected if The application accepts URLs with decimal-encoded IP addresses and processes the request, indicating the validation bypass is present
You are affected if your concrete5 installation is version 8.5.4 or earlier AND your site has features that accept URL input from users, allowing potential SSRF attacks via decimal IP notation bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.5
Upgrade concrete5 to version 8.5.5 or later, which includes proper input validation to prevent decimal notation IP address bypasses.
Concrete CMS 8.5.5 or later
- 1. Create a complete backup of the database and all site files
- 2. Download Concrete CMS version 8.5.5 or later from the official Concrete CMS repository (https://www.concretecms.com/download)
- 3. Extract the new version files
- 4. Upload the new files to your server, overwriting the existing installation
- 5. Run the upgrade process by accessing your site URL - the system will automatically detect and apply updates
- 6. Clear any caching mechanisms (application cache, opcode cache, CDN cache)
- 7. Verify the installation by logging into the dashboard and confirming version number
- 8. Test that external requests work properly and the SSRF protection correctly blocks malicious requests
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22958 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22958 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data