CVE-2021-22974
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2, 14.1.x before 14.1.3.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6 and all versions of BIG-IQ 7.x and 6.x, an authenticated attacker with access to iControl REST over the control plane may be able to take advantage of a race condition to execute commands with an elevated privilege level. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-6167. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRace condition vulnerability in the iControl REST API on F5 BIG-IP and BIG-IQ allows authenticated attackers to execute commands with elevated privileges. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-6167, exploitable via the control plane network interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.3.6>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.3.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.2>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigpipe version' from the command line to obtain the installed BIG-IP software versionAffected if The version falls within any of the affected ranges: 13.1.0 to <13.1.3.5/6, 14.1.0 to <14.1.3.1, 15.1.0 to <15.1.2, or 16.0.0 to <16.0.1.1 (exact upper bound varies by module)
-
Determine which BIG-IP modules are licensedRun 'tmsh list sys license' or check the BIG-IP configuration for active module licenses such as APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, or DNSAffected if Any of the affected modules (APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, DNS, DDOS Hybrid Defender) are licensed on a vulnerable version
-
Verify iControl REST API is enabledCheck the iControl REST service status via 'tmsh list sys service icr' or review the /etc/httpd/conf.d/icontrol_rest.conf configuration file for the service listening statusAffected if iControl REST API service is running and accessible on the control plane interface
-
Confirm network exposure of iControl RESTReview the self IP addresses and VLAN configuration accessible via 'tmsh list net self' and verify whether the management interface or control plane network is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if iControl REST is exposed on a network accessible to untrusted users rather than isolated to management-only access
-
Check for existing exploitation indicatorsReview system logs in /var/log/audit for suspicious iControl REST API calls, particularly those involving command execution or privilege escalation patterns
The environment is affected if BIG-IP is running a version within the affected ranges AND iControl REST API is enabled and accessible on the control plane network interface to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data13.1.3.513.1.3.614.1.3.1
Apply F5 security updates: BIG-IP 16.0.1.1+, 15.1.2+, 14.1.3.1+, 13.1.3.6+ or later; BIG-IQ requires patching per F5 advisory. Restrict iControl REST access to trusted networks and rotate credentials.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-22974 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-22974 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data