CVE-2021-23039
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.2.8, and all versions of 13.1.x and 12.1.x, when IPSec is configured on a BIG-IP system, undisclosed requests from an authorized remote (IPSec) peer, which already has a negotiated Security Association, can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDenial of service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP where an authorized IPSec peer with an already-negotiated Security Association can send undisclosed requests that cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate, disrupting all traffic processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.6>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.4>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.8>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.3>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun command 'tmsh show sys version' or check System > Information > Version in the web UI to obtain the installed version numberAffected if The version falls within any of these affected ranges: 12.1.0-12.1.6, 13.1.0-13.1.4, 14.1.0-14.1.2.7, 15.1.0-15.1.2, or 16.0.0-16.0.1.1
-
Verify IPSec is configuredRun 'tmsh list net ipsec' to list all IPSec tunnel or policy configurations, or check under Network > IPSec in the web UIAffected if Any IPSec tunnels or policies are configured on the device (the vulnerability requires an already-negotiated Security Association to trigger the flaw)
-
Confirm IPSec peers are activeRun 'tmsh show net ipsec' or 'tmsh show net ipsec ike' to see active IPSec Security Associations and peer statusAffected if There are active IPSec SAs with peers, meaning traffic can be processed through the IPSec tunnel (an active SA is required for the attack to be possible)
You are affected if your BIG-IP runs an affected version AND has IPSec tunnels configured with active peer connections, as the vulnerability is triggered by requests from an already-authenticated IPSec peer.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.1.2.815.1.316.0.1.2
Upgrade BIG-IP to fixed versions (16.0.1.2+, 15.1.3+, 14.1.2.8+) or disable IPSec if not required, as the vulnerability is triggered by requests from an already-authenticated IPSec peer.
14.1.2.8+ or 15.1.3+ or 16.0.1.2+ (depending on current branch)
- Identify the currently installed BIG-IP version using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web UI.
- If running 12.1.x or 13.1.x, note these versions have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) and require upgrade to a currently supported version.
- If running 14.1.x (14.1.0 to 14.1.2.7), upgrade to 14.1.2.8 or later.
- If running 15.1.x (15.1.0 to 15.1.2.x), upgrade to 15.1.3 or later.
- If running 16.0.x (16.0.0 to 16.0.1.1), upgrade to 16.0.1.2 or later.
- Download the appropriate hotfix from support.f5.com and follow F5's upgrade documentation.
- After upgrade, verify the version with 'tmsh show sys version' and test IPSec functionality.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23039 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23039 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data