CVE-2021-23055
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn version 2.x before 2.0.3 and 1.x before 1.12.3, the command line restriction that controls snippet use with NGINX Ingress Controller does not apply to Ingress objects. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe NGINX Ingress Controller has a command-line flag to restrict NGINX snippet usage for security, but this restriction is not enforced when snippets are defined in Ingress objects, allowing a bypass of the intended security control. An attacker with permission to create or modify Ingress resources could potentially inject malicious NGINX configuration through snippets despite the command-line restriction being enabled.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0.0, < 1.12.3>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Nginx Ingress Controller versionRun 'kubectl get pods -n <ingress-namespace> -o jsonpath="{.items[*].spec.containers[*].image}"' or check the deployment image. For Helm deployments, run 'helm list -A' and inspect the chart version.Affected if The installed version is >=1.0.0 and <1.12.3, or >=2.0.0 and <2.0.3
-
Check if Ingress resources contain snippet annotationsRun 'kubectl get ingress --all-namespaces -o json' and search for annotations containing 'snippet' or the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/configuration-snippet key.Affected if Any Ingress object has nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/configuration-snippet or nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/server-snippet annotations defined
-
Verify the command-line security flag is configuredInspect the Ingress Controller deployment/daemonset: 'kubectl get deploy -n <ingress-namespace> -o json' and check spec.template.spec.containers[].command for flags like --annotations-snippet or verify if the ConfigMap enables allow-snippet-annotations.Affected if The --annotations-snippet flag is set to 'true' or the ConfigMap has allow-snippet-annotations: true, and Ingress resources contain snippets despite this setting
-
Inspect Ingress objects for injected configurationReview all Ingress resources in the cluster for any unexpected or suspicious content within snippet annotations, comparing against expected legitimate snippets.Affected if Ingress resources contain snippets that should have been blocked by the command-line restriction but were applied to NGINX configuration
You are affected if your Nginx Ingress Controller version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND you have Ingress resources with snippet annotations that bypass the intended command-line restriction.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.12.32.0.3
Upgrade NGINX Ingress Controller to version 2.0.3+ (2.x) or 1.12.3+ (1.x). As a compensating control, review existing Ingress objects for unauthorized snippet usage and consider using Kubernetes admission policies to block Ingress resources containing snippets.
1.12.3 (1.x branch) or 2.0.3 (2.x branch)
- Upgrade Nginx Ingress Controller to version 1.12.3 or later for the 1.x branch
- Alternatively, upgrade to version 2.0.3 or later for the 2.x branch
- After upgrade, verify that snippet restrictions are properly enforced for Ingress objects by testing your Ingress configurations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23055 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23055 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data