Joomla\!Application · Joomla

CVE-2021-23127

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-03-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.9.25 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.9.24. Usage of an insufficient length for the 2FA secret accoring to RFC 4226 of 10 bytes vs 20 bytes.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Joomla versions 3.2.0 through 3.9.24 use an insufficient 10-byte secret for TOTP-based two-factor authentication instead of the RFC 4226 compliant 20-byte secret. This reduces the entropy of generated 2FA codes, weakening the authentication mechanism and potentially making brute-force attacks more feasible.

MitigationUpgrade Joomla to version 3.9.25 or later which implements the proper 20-byte secret length per RFC 4226. Existing 2FA secrets should be re-generated after the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Joomla\!Application
Affected:>= 3.2.0, < 3.9.25

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check your Joomla version
    Navigate to Joomla admin dashboard > Help > About or check the libraries/cms.php file for the version constant
    Affected if The version is 3.2.0 through 3.9.24 (anything >= 3.2.0 and < 3.9.25)
  2. Identify if TOTP 2FA is configured
    Check the Joomla user manager for users with two-factor authentication enabled, or query the database for users with non-empty 2FA secret fields
    Affected if Any user accounts have TOTP-based two-factor authentication enabled on this Joomla installation
  3. Inspect the stored TOTP secret length
    Examine the secret value stored in the database for users with 2FA enabled. TOTP secrets are Base32-encoded; a 10-byte secret encodes to 16 Base32 characters, while a proper 20-byte secret encodes to 32 Base32 characters
    Affected if The stored secret is 16 Base32 characters (10 bytes) instead of 32 characters (20 bytes), indicating the weak secret format is in use

You are affected if your Joomla version is between 3.2.0 and 3.9.24 and you have users with TOTP 2FA enabled using the weaker 10-byte secret format.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.9.25 or later
Fixed in 3.9.25
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Joomla to version 3.9.25 or later which implements the proper 20-byte secret length per RFC 4226. Existing 2FA secrets should be re-generated after the update.

Recommended fix High confidence

Joomla! 3.9.25

  1. Create a complete backup of the Joomla site files and database before proceeding
  2. Download Joomla! 3.9.25 from the official Joomla! downloads page (downloads.joomla.org)
  3. Log in to the Joomla Administrator backend
  4. Navigate to Components > Joomla Update
  5. Either use the one-click update feature if it detects the new version, or upload the downloaded Joomla 3.9.25 package
  6. Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
  7. Run any pending database migrations when prompted
  8. Clear the Joomla cache (System > Clear Cache)
Caveat Joomla minor version upgrades (3.9.x to 3.9.y) typically do not introduce breaking changes; however, always review the release notes for any deprecated features or required configuration adjustments before upgrading.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Joomla\! Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23127 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23127 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data