CVE-2021-23146
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors vulnerability in the Gallagher Controller allows an attacker to bypass PIV verification. This issue affects: Gallagher Command Centre 8.40 versions prior to 8.40.1888 (MR3); 8.30 versions prior to 8.30.1359 (MR3); 8.20 versions prior to 8.20.1259 (MR5); 8.10 versions prior to 8.10.1284 (MR7); version 8.00 and prior versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability is an incomplete comparison flaw in the Gallagher Command Centre's PIV (Personal Identity Verification) credential verification logic. The system fails to properly validate all required authentication factors when verifying PIV credentials, allowing an attacker to bypass the verification process and potentially gain unauthorized physical access through the access control system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.00>= 8.10, < 8.10.1284>= 8.20, < 8.20.1259>= 8.30, < 8.30.1359>= 8.40, < 8.40.1888CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Command Centre versionAccess the Gallagher Command Centre admin interface and navigate to Help > About, or check the installation logs and system information panel to locate the exact version number (e.g., 8.30.1200)Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: <= 8.00, >= 8.10 and < 8.10.1284, >= 8.20 and < 8.20.1259, >= 8.30 and < 8.30.1359, or >= 8.40 and < 8.40.1888
-
Confirm PIV credential verification is configuredIn the Command Centre admin interface, navigate to Access Control > Credentials > PIV Credentials, or check the credential provider configuration to determine if PIV credential verification is enabled for any doors or access pointsAffected if PIV credential verification is actively configured and used for access control
-
Verify PIV authentication factor settingsReview the PIV credential reader configuration and authentication policy settings to confirm that the system is validating PIV credentials without the complete factor comparison (specific configuration details may vary by deployment)Affected if PIV credential verification is enabled and the version is in the affected range, the incomplete comparison flaw may be present
A user is affected if their Command Centre version is less than 8.10.1284, 8.20.1259, 8.30.1359, or 8.40.1888 AND they have PIV credential verification configured in their access control system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.10.12848.20.12598.30.1359
Apply the appropriate patch version for your Command Centre branch: upgrade to 8.40.1888 (MR3), 8.30.1359 (MR3), 8.20.1259 (MR5), 8.10.1284 (MR7), or later versions. For older branches, migrate to a supported version.
8.40.1888 (MR3), 8.30.1359 (MR3), 8.20.1259 (MR5), or 8.10.1284 (MR7) depending on your version branch
- Identify the currently installed Gallagher Command Centre version by checking the controller or admin interface
- Determine which version branch you are running (8.00, 8.10, 8.20, 8.30, or 8.40)
- For Command Centre 8.40: upgrade to version 8.40.1888 (MR3) or later
- For Command Centre 8.30: upgrade to version 8.30.1359 (MR3) or later
- For Command Centre 8.20: upgrade to version 8.20.1259 (MR5) or later
- For Command Centre 8.10: upgrade to version 8.10.1284 (MR7) or later
- For Command Centre 8.00 or prior: upgrade to at least version 8.10.1284 or later (recommended to upgrade to latest stable branch)
- After upgrade, verify PIV authentication is functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23146 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23146 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data