CVE-2021-23860
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn error in a page handler of the VRM may lead to a reflected cross site scripting (XSS) in the web-based interface. To exploit this vulnerability an attack must be able to modify the HTTP header that is sent. This issue also affects installations of the DIVAR IP and BVMS with VRM installed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the VRM (Video Recording Manager) web interface. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of HTTP headers in a page handler, allowing an attacker to inject malicious scripts that are reflected back to the user's browser. The attack requires the ability to modify HTTP headers sent to the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 9.0>= 10.0, < 10.0.2= 10.1= 11.0<= 3.81>= 3.82, <= 3.82.0057>= 3.83, <= 3.83.0021>= 4.0, <= 4.00.0070CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm VRM web interface is accessibleAccess the VRM web interface URL (typically port 808 or 8443 for VRM) in a browser or via curl. Check if the login page or VRM dashboard loads.Affected if The VRM web interface is reachable and responding to HTTP requests.
-
Identify installed product typeDetermine whether Bosch Video Management System (BVMS) or standalone Video Recording Manager (VRM) is deployed. Check installed programs, services, or documentation.Affected if Either BVMS or standalone VRM software is installed.
-
Check BVMS versionIf using Bosch Video Management System, open the BVMS Configuration Client or check the About section in the administration page. Alternatively, check the installed software version in Windows Programs and Features.Affected if The installed BVMS version is <= 9.0, >= 10.0 but < 10.0.2, exactly 10.1, or exactly 11.0.
-
Check VRM versionIf using standalone Video Recording Manager, open the VRM web interface admin page or check the installed software version in Windows Programs and Features.Affected if The installed VRM version is <= 3.81, >= 3.82 but <= 3.82.0057, >= 3.83 but <= 3.83.0021, or >= 4.0 but <= 4.00.0070.
-
Verify VRM page handler accepts custom headersSend an HTTP request to the VRM web interface with a custom X-Test header containing a test value (for example, curl -H 'X-Test: <script>alert(1)</script>' http://<vrm-host>:<port>/). Observe whether the value is reflected in the response without encoding.Affected if The VRM web interface reflects custom HTTP header values back in the response without sanitization or encoding.
The environment is affected if VRM web interface is running and the installed version falls within any of the affected BVMS or VRM version ranges listed, AND the VRM page handler reflects custom HTTP headers without proper encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.2
Implement proper input validation and output encoding for all HTTP header values in the VRM page handler to prevent XSS injection. Alternatively, deploy a web application firewall (WAF) rule to filter malicious header content until a code-level fix is available.
BVMS: 10.0.2 or later for 10.x line, or latest 10.x/11.x release; VRM: 3.82.0058+, 3.83.0022+, or 4.00.0071+ depending on branch
- 1. Identify the exact version of Bosch Video Management System (BVMS) or Video Recording Manager (VRM) currently installed
- 2. For BVMS 10.0.x installations: upgrade to BVMS 10.0.2 or later
- 3. For BVMS 10.1.x installations: upgrade to a version newer than 10.1 (e.g., 10.0.2 or later if applicable, or next major release)
- 4. For BVMS 11.0.x installations: upgrade to a version newer than 11.0
- 5. For BVMS 9.0 and below: upgrade to a supported newer version (e.g., 10.0.2 or later)
- 6. For VRM 3.82.x: upgrade to VRM version 3.82.0058 or later
- 7. For VRM 3.83.x: upgrade to VRM version 3.83.0022 or later
- 8. For VRM 4.0.x: upgrade to VRM version 4.00.0071 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23860 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data