CVE-2021-24008
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability [CWE-497] in FortiDDoS version 5.4.0, version 5.3.2 and below, version 5.2.0, version 5.1.0, version 5.0.0, version 4.7.0, version 4.6.0, version 4.5.0, version 4.4.2 and below, FortiDDoS-CM version 5.3.0, version 5.2.0, version 5.1.0, version 5.0.0, version 4.7.0, FortiVoice version 6.0.6 and below, FortiRecorder version 6.0.3 and below and FortiMail version 6.4.1 and below, version 6.2.4 and below, version 6.0.9 and below may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to obtain potentially sensitive software-version information by reading a JavaScript file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated remote attacker can obtain sensitive software version information by reading JavaScript files served by the web interface of affected Fortinet products (FortiDDoS, FortiVoice, FortiRecorder, FortiMail). This information disclosure (CWE-497) could aid attackers in reconnaissance for more targeted exploits.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.10>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.5>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.2>= 4.4.0, < 5.4.3>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.7>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.4= 4.7.0= 5.0.0= 5.1.0= 5.2.0= 5.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Fortinet product and versionLog into the device via CLI and run the command: 'get system status' or 'fortimail -status' depending on the product. Alternatively, access the web login page and check any error messages or footer for version info.Affected if The displayed version matches any of the affected ranges: FortiMail 6.0.0-6.0.9, 6.2.0-6.2.4, or 6.4.0-6.4.1; FortiDDoS 4.4.0-5.4.2; FortiVoice 6.0.0-6.0.6; FortiRecorder 6.0.0-6.0.3; FortiDDoS CM 4.7.0, 5.0.0, 5.1.0, 5.2.0, or 5.3.0
-
Confirm the web management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the web interface URL (typically HTTPS on port 443) from a network location. Use a browser or curl command: 'curl -k https://<device-ip>/'Affected if The web interface responds and is reachable from your location, indicating the attack surface is exposed
-
Verify JavaScript files are served by the web interfaceAccess common JS file paths such as '/js/common.js' or '/static/js/' on the web interface using curl or browser. Example: 'curl -k https://<device-ip>/js/common.js'Affected if JavaScript files are returned and contain version information, confirming the information disclosure vector is present
You are affected if your Fortinet product is one of FortiMail, FortiDDoS, FortiVoice, or FortiRecorder, the web interface is accessible, and the installed version falls within the affected ranges listed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.4.36.0.46.0.7
Apply the vendor patches provided by Fortinet for the affected product versions. Until patches can be applied, consider restricting access to the web management interface to trusted networks only.
FortiMail: 6.0.10+/6.2.5+/6.4.2+ | FortiDDoS: 5.4.3+ | FortiVoice: 6.0.7+ | FortiRecorder: 6.0.4+ | FortiDDoS-CM: 5.3.1+
- 1. Identify the specific Forti product (FortiMail, FortiDDoS, FortiVoice, FortiRecorder, or FortiDDoS-CM) currently deployed in your environment.
- 2. Determine the exact current version of the deployed Forti product.
- 3. For FortiMail: upgrade to version 6.0.10, 6.2.5, or 6.4.2 or later depending on your current branch (6.0.x, 6.2.x, or 6.4.x).
- 4. For FortiDDoS: upgrade to version 5.4.3 or later.
- 5. For FortiVoice: upgrade to version 6.0.7 or later.
- 6. For FortiRecorder: upgrade to version 6.0.4 or later.
- 7. For FortiDDoS-CM: upgrade to version 5.3.1 or later.
- 8. After upgrade, verify the JavaScript file is no longer exposing software version information by attempting to access it without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-24008 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-24008 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data