CVE-2021-24044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBy passing invalid javascript code where await and yield were called upon non-async and non-generator getter/setter functions, Hermes would invoke generator functions and error out on invalid await/yield positions. This could result in segmentation fault as a consequence of type confusion error, with a low chance of RCE. This issue affects Hermes versions prior to v0.10.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in the Hermes JavaScript engine allows attackers to cause a segmentation fault by passing invalid JavaScript code that uses await or yield on non-async and non-generator getter/setter functions. Hermes incorrectly invokes generator functions on invalid await/yield positions, leading to type confusion that can potentially result in remote code execution with low probability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Hermes versionLocate the Hermes library binary or package in your deployment and check its version string (e.g., 'hermes --version', check library file metadata, or inspect the version field in your package manager if Hermes is installed as a dependency)Affected if The installed Hermes version is below 0.10.0
-
Confirm Hermes is used for JS executionReview your application code and configuration to determine if Hermes is the JavaScript engine responsible for executing JavaScript code in your environmentAffected if Hermes is actively used as the JavaScript runtime
-
Determine if untrusted code is processedAudit the code paths where Hermes executes JavaScript: identify whether user-supplied or third-party scripts are passed to Hermes without validation, check if Hermes is used in a context where external parties can provide JavaScript inputAffected if Untrusted or user-controlled JavaScript code is executed through Hermes without sanitization
-
Inspect for vulnerable await/yield patternsSearch your JavaScript codebase (or the scripts you run via Hermes) for getter or setter definitions that use 'await' or 'yield' on non-async functions or non-generator functions, which would trigger the type confusionAffected if Your scripts contain getter/setter functions that misuse await or yield in ways that trigger the vulnerability
You are affected if your environment runs Hermes version below 0.10.0 and executes untrusted JavaScript code that could contain the specific await/yield on non-async/non-generator getter/setter patterns that trigger the type confusion.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.10.0
Upgrade Hermes to version v0.10.0 or later. Until the upgrade is applied, avoid executing untrusted JavaScript code through Hermes and implement input validation on any user-controlled scripts.
Hermes v0.10.0
- Identify the current Hermes version used in your project (check package.json, podfile, or dependency lock files)
- Update the Hermes dependency to version 0.10.0 or later. For React Native projects, update the React Native version that bundles the fixed Hermes version, or explicitly update the Hermes CocoaPod if your project allows it
- Rebuild and recompile the application to ensure the new Hermes library is linked
- Test the application thoroughly, specifically testing any JavaScript code involving async functions, generators, or custom getters/setters to verify the type confusion vulnerability is resolved
- Verify the upgrade by confirming the Hermes version in the built application matches 0.10.0 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-24044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-24044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data