CVE-2021-24122
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen serving resources from a network location using the NTFS file system, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.39, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.106 were susceptible to JSP source code disclosure in some configurations. The root cause was the unexpected behaviour of the JRE API File.getCanonicalPath() which in turn was caused by the inconsistent behaviour of the Windows API (FindFirstFileW) in some circumstances.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Tomcat versions prior to 10.0.0-M10, 9.0.40, 8.5.60, and 7.0.107 have a JSP source code disclosure vulnerability when serving resources from Windows network shares using NTFS file system. The issue stems from inconsistent behavior of the Windows API FindFirstFileW which causes File.getCanonicalPath() to return unexpected paths, allowing attackers to bypass JSP execution and retrieve source code instead.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.106>= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.59>= 9.0.1, <= 9.0.39= 9.0.0= 10.0.0= 9.0= 9.3.3= 9.3.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Tomcat versionRun 'catalina.sh version' or check the version.jar file in the Tomcat lib directory, or look at the RELEASE-NOTES file in the Tomcat home directoryAffected if The installed version falls within 7.0.0 to 7.0.106, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59, 9.0.0 to 9.0.39, or equals 10.0.0-M10 or 10.0.0 (note: 10.0.0-M10 is actually fixed, so only 10.0.0 is affected)
-
Determine if Tomcat serves content from network sharesReview the server.xml configuration file and any web application context configurations to identify if the docBase, alias, or any resource paths are specified as UNC paths (\\server\share)Affected if The docBase or any resource path points to a Windows network share (UNC path beginning with \\\\)
-
Verify the operating system and file systemCheck the OS type by running 'uname -a' on Linux or 'systeminfo' on Windows, and determine if the served network share uses NTFS by examining the remote share properties or mounting configurationAffected if Tomcat is running on Windows and serving content from a network share that uses NTFS file system
-
Check for JSP file access patternsReview web server access logs for requests to .jsp files that return source code (HTTP 200 with Content-Type not being application/octet-stream or the JSP source visible in response) rather than executing the JSPAffected if JSP files are being served as plain text instead of being executed, exposing source code
You are affected if you run a vulnerable Apache Tomcat version (7.0.0-7.0.106, 8.5.0-8.5.59, 9.0.0-9.0.39, or 10.0.0) on Windows while serving web application content from an NTFS network share, allowing attackers to retrieve JSP source code instead of executed output.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apache Tomcat to version 10.0.0-M10 or later (10.0.x), 9.0.40 or later (9.0.x), 8.5.60 or later (8.5.x), or 7.0.107 or later (7.0.x). If upgrading is not feasible, avoid serving resources from network locations on Windows NTFS file systems.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-24122 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-24122 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data